New technologies frequently carry an important price tag

The last argument concerns the welfare of the individual animal. Cows have proved to have high diversity in their learning curve with some animals displaying a consistent need for cues and stimuli even after a long period. The negative sides of VF use include the risk of animal long-term exposure to the electric stimulus, negatively affecting animal welfare , and public opinion . In the case of Mediterranean sheep farming, adoption of VF is not as appealing as grazing areas are of medium size . These plots are easier to manage using traditional methods such as daytime shepherding, wire fences or electrical fences in comparison to the bigger grazing plots typical to other areas . Automated grass measurement system , used for evaluation of herbage mass, is another tool for pasture management based on a microsonic measurement device and real-time data transmission. The GH measures the return time for a sonic transmission from its reflective circular plate rested on the grass to the emitter. The time is calculated in order to obtain the traveling distance of the plate, measuring the grass high. The data are integrated with GPS system which provides information about the sample position in the paddock. It can also be uploaded to a digital support tool called ‘Pasturebase Ireland’, allowing an overall vision of regional and national grass availability. This provides key information needed for the planning of animal movement and pasture availability throughout the year.Several flock management software products are currently available on the market for commercial use. The predominant functions include flock registry, yield tracking,tower garden breeding line and decision-making aids for the farmer comparing individual animal with the flock trends and averages. For example, available products such as Sheep Tracker, SumIt, Flock Filer and Farmplan integrate data from various sources in order to provide a general view of the flock dynamics as well as track individual animal and its genetic lineage.

However, the interest on the side of the farmers remains limited, even while understanding possible benefits of implementation of such software. The hesitation of adoption is frequently linked to the perceived role of the stock person, and the notion that software cannot replace the manual labour needed on the farm .Sheep farmers, as any producer, adopt technologies fit for their needs and the value of which they can easily recognize. Examples from modern times can include the Quad bikes considered by farmers ‘the biggest technological step since the barbed wire’ , and electrical fencing, especially when combined with solar panels and movable posts. Both share a common feature; they improve an already known task adding the value of better performance and lower costs. Farmers seem to appreciate technologies that have the least interferences with established routines and that they are able to service and manage by themselves . Precision livestock farming systems and new technologies however require a new set of skills to be acquired , as well as frequently dependent on specialized technicians. The mentioned work of Rieple and Snijders also emphasizes that farmers operate in transparency one to another; therefore, community opinions, acceptance and financial risk taking play a big role in decision-making processes. Among farmers, big economic investments and the deviation of paradigms produce a social pressure which does not encourage innovation. Therefore, technology seems to appear more threatening and less acceptable in comparison to other less evident changes. The lack of network coverage and its instability, especially in mountainous areas, also play a role in the mistrust many farmers have regarding new, communication-based technologies .

Although several solutions are being developed , this still represents an important challenge.The average age of sheep farmers is over 55, a factor highly correlated with attitudes towards innovation, flexibility and tendency towards the risk of investments. An example for farmers’ indisposition towards technologies could be seen regarding the introduction of EIDobligatory use. The move which represents a key step towards smart farming in the extensive sector was not necessarily viewed as such by the farmers themselves. In a recent survey done by Lima et al. among English sheep farmers, 36% agreed and 26% strongly agreed with the affirmation:‘There is too much pressure on farmers by the government and the market to adopt new technologies. A more complete analysis conducted on farmer’s inclinations used surveys, analysis groups and panel experts from different European countries’ . The results show that the main drive for adoption is the economic stability of the farm. With smaller and less profitable farms being reluctant to invest in new technologies . Other major causes included levels of complexity and user interface, as well as correlation to production values. In contrast to expert panel opinions, age and education levels of the farmers had only marginal impacts on technology adoption. The ability to generate income and cash availability were also cited as main reason for PLF system adoption among Kentucky dairy cow farmers, with overload of information, lack of reliability, and poor technical support being the deterring factors . Regarding specifically the sheep sector, a survey conducted by Sheep Net among different European sheep farmers supports the previously described perspectives from other sectors with positive views towards PLF being related to larger income and farm size availability. Dairy farmers stand out for more frequent adoption of PLF systems; however, no distinction was made in the survey between extensive and intensive dairy sheep farms. There is, however, a small but consistent population of early adopters in every production sector . This group is more open to the introduction of new technologies and practices. As peer influence is a big factor in farmer’s decision-making process, the influence of this group could trickle towards other farmers as well. It is also worth mentioning “agricultural startups” led by new farmers which enter the agricultural world for reasons of ethical and ecological views.

This group is usually free of traditional perceptions of agriculture and is more open towards innovation .Around the Mediterranean, the break-even milk price is lower than the average market price in the market . Although other products such as light lamb are a popular secondary product and may add up to 30% of farm income milk prices remain the main inhibiting factor for new investments in technologies . The individual farmer has several financial instruments to his disposal which include both private equity sources and debt schemes, as well as aid schemes . While the private equity could be considered as ‘“Secured funding sources”, where farmers can rely on their production capacity and the ability to obtain bank loans. Subsidies are frequently considered ‘Unsecured funds’ as the accessibility to the funds is based on project presentation and may require technical extension services. While these schemes provide an important source for financial aid, especially for modernization projects, it remains an unstable source in the eyes of many farmers . It is important to note that direct aid, CAP payments and other financial supports for production are considered a reliable part, the annual budget and part the farm gross income considerations.While some such as AD and WC with average costs of 5 000 to 7 000€ may be accessible to farmers using their secured funding sources bigger investments will require the involvement aid schemes. The time-consuming process of application and the bureaucracy barriers represent important deterrents to accessibility. However, in case of coupled payment schemes where financial aid is linked to innovation, farmer’s interest in new technologies may be increased. Such trends were already observed in other coupled CAP aid schemes involving farm modernization .In order to evaluate possible prospects for integration of PLF systems and new technologies in Mediterranean dairy sheep farming, key challenges should be identified.

As in most livestock farming sectors, feed and labour are the largest costs faced by the farmer. In the case of extensive dairy sheep farming, the feed cost is represented by the management of available pasture resources and supplemented feeding, while animal handling and milking activity represent the major labour investments.Rationalization of available grazing area is needed in order to better manage and maximize the pasture productivity. By adjusting stocking density and time, grazing efficiency of a given pasture can be significantly increased. This activity is a time-consuming process which includes the costs of fencing and animal movement which takes a large portion of production costs in extensive systems.Automated drafters allow reduction of animal movement costs by selective entry of animals based on RFID recognition.The development of virtual fencing aims to provide an innovative solution to grazing management introducing the ability to confine and move the animals without the need for manual labour or physical barrier. Application of VF can reduce the costs of fencing, and efficiency of movement is increased due to animal conditioning to signals . Paired with tri-axial accelerometers and/or GPS,stacking flower pot tower a precision grazing may be achieved through data provided on feed intake and grazing patterns. This application is currently under researched with the aim of balancing animal grazing and pasture production .Supplemented feeding in sheep farming takes several forms: barn enclosure and feeding, on-pasture total mixed ration feeding, ‘Creep grazing’ and ‘Bale grazing’ or no supplementation at all. Specifically, in case of dairy ewe’s supplementation, it can also take place in the parlour during milking. In case of inadequate supplementation, animal gain and production are reduced, milk quality suffers which also impacts cheese quality. Mortality rates can also grow especially among pregnant ewes or weaker individual animals with higher metabolic needs and lower fat reserves.

Supplementation increases the production costs and its application for efficiency/cost is key for efficient farm management. Currently, available systems which combine EIDs, automatic weights and drafters aim to increase this efficiency. Among the systems which were reviewed so far, the combination of WC, EIDs and ADs is the most mature products already presented and marketed for common use. Another increasingly available product is personalized feeding in milking parlour allowing a single animal supplementation .This infrastructure and activity is unique to the dairy sector and represents a key investment for the farmers, with milking costs representing over 10% of the production costs per liter . The process is also important for animal health and management, and presents space for integration of PLF systems and new technologies . Incorporation of RFID-based identification in the milking stations can allow the implementation of precision feeding, ADs and better group management. Restoration, upgrading and construction of new parlours also represent a key moment for investment, as frequently there are dedicated support schemes offered by the EU CAP funds for such projects .Technology acceptance and uptake is a complex matter influenced by a variety of factors such as socio-demographics , financial resources and farm size . The current state of extensive sheep farming in FIGS countries does not encourage such acceptance with increasing age and low profitability margins . Investment, especially in new technology it is not an appealing option. However, emerging trends could lead to some changes in the sector representing challenges and opportunities to which sheep farmers will need to adapt. Consequently, farmers’ perception of PLF technologies and their possible advantages could change due to the following conditions.Although sheep milk production represents only 1.3% of total world milk production, it has seen an increase of more than 100% in the last 50 years with average growth of 10–20% per year. Most of its international trade is in the form of cheese products with PDO such as the Italian Pecorino Romano cheese, main importers being the USA and Germany . Increased demand from the industries is a key factor which leads to innovation and intensification of farming practices, and the dairy sheep sector is no different . Increase in sheep meat demand in EU countries, especially from ethnic minorities originally from the Middle East or North Africa, may drive further increase in flock size and lamb production as a response to the growing demand . Wool production in the region is negligible, and although local enterprises try to re-establish traditional wool products the activity remains limited. Main obstacle is the fibre quality of diary breed wool, deemed to coarse for modern production .

The Agro-experts can access the system by initially entering the login credentials

The new queries or complaints can be filtered by selecting the ‘unresolved’ status. Supervisor can read the new query or complaint and based on the content, assigns it to one of the agro-experts with relevant expertise. Upon assignment, the status of the query or complaint is automatically changed to ‘in process’ by the system and an email is also sent to agro-expert, notifying them that a new query or complaint has been assigned. Supervisor can see the list of all argo-experts and can also see the list of queries or complaints assigned to each argo-expert. Moreover, supervisor can monitor the performance of every argo-expert based on the number of queries or complaints resolved by them.After login, agro-expert can see their dashboard, with a list of all queries or complaints assigned to them. The new queries or complaints can be filtered by clicking the ‘unresolved’ status. Agro-expert can click the query or complaint to study its content and view the provided images/audio files and then can submit the response by adding a solution or a comment or a question to ask farmer to elaborate the problem further. Based on the response,square plastic pot agro-expert can change the status of the query or complaint to ‘resolved’ or can leave it as ‘in process’.

Agro-experts receive a system generated automated email for each query or complaint assigned to them or when status of a query or complaint is changed. Agro-experts can also visualize their performance based on the number of queries or complaints they resolved.Agriculture in developing countries contributes a big portion to national GDP, but there is a lack of effective support for farmers to adopt suitable agricultural practices through technology advancements. Farmers usually require timely advice and suggestions on crop patterns, diseases and prevention actions to tackle emerging situations. However, the development of a reliable, scalable, real time responsive system that is available 24/7 and fulfills the information requirements and support of farmers is still an open issue, especially in large agricultural countries like Egypt. The agri-culture sector’s data can be historical as well as processes related. Processing and analysing these massive amounts of data is challenging and involves a number of critical decisions such as selection of data storage depending on the nature and modalities of data involved. The large amounts of data being collected in the agriculture sector is expected to have an impact not only on smart farming but will also improve the decision-making capabilities of the farmers and government. The future of agriculture undoubtedly seems to lie in embarking on big data technologies and smart farming. Moreover, integration of concepts like Data Force Analytics and by providing a series of training to the system users, the whole process can be speed up overtime.

Consequently, farmers will be able to directly interact with such systems for their queries without interacting with human resources. To make a progress towards few of these challenges, the architecture of AgroSupportAnalytics has been developed. This has enabled building a support system that facilitates the provision of timely advice and relevant predictions to farmers. This, operational currently, will ensure a reduction and mitigation of significant negative effects of many serious challenges and threats facing the farming community and hence the agriculture sector in Egypt. The support provided will be more consistent, timely, reliable, and at easy reach, not only for ‘research centres’ but also for the ’agricultural associations,’ with minimal training and resources needed. The developed architecture of Agro Support Analytics has been designed on the basis of the following non-functional requirements. Scalability ‘ The Agro Support Analytics has several separated components in the architecture that allows easy scalability by upgrading one or more of those individual components. As an example, if the number of farmers/users/clients grows that may require splitting the Web Service by adding new capacity to deal with the client demand which means more Web Servers on the Information and Analysis Services Layer. Resilience and Redundancy ‘ The architecture of Agro Support Analytics is resilient as the critical components can be split in tiers that are clustered and geographically split to ensure failover, hence a more resilient system. Maintenance flexibility – As with the case of scalability, having distinct tiers allows pin pointed maintenance actions that do not produce collateral unwanted effects. This means that maintenance scheduling has fewer dependencies from 3rd party components. Developer Friendly Environment ‘ Having the several coding layers split by distinct tiers allows developers to focus on their individual task without having to share resources or bear in mind collateral potential impacts in each other’s tasks/domains. This is the type of architecture that also empowers frameworks and programming cultures like that of Agile development methodologies.

The prototype system is being operational currently and undergoing a process of outreach campaign to ensure sufficient stakeholder awareness of the services and capabilities it provides. A few snapshots of the Agro Support Analytics system is shown as Fig. 4. A transition stage is expected to follow in the near future whereby both farmers and agricultural experts will be using the system for their usual query-response activities. That is, besides the efficiency and effectiveness in dealing with farmers’ enquiries, the presented system can provide a sustainable and near real-time advice to the large sector of farmers in Egypt, that is besides vitally needed insights and projections of future events, relevant to their decision and action making. Currently, the Agro Support Analytics system doesn’t directly cater for IoT integration and analytics, which can also be an interesting future direction.The increase in population growth is accompanied by an increase in demand for food production. The FAO reported that the world population would be reached 9.73 billion by 2050, and the increase will continue till reach 11.2 billion by 2100 . Many challenges impede agricultural production, which leads to a decrease in crop productivity, such as soil salinity in arid conditions . In addition, the climate also affects the quantity and quality of crops and may lead to an increase in soil sensitivity to desertification . Therefore, the focus on survey land resources to use in agricultural development in arid regions is necessary . In developing world countries, the agricultural sector is one of the most important pillars of national income. Therefore, implementing new technologies to improve the agricultural sector is a significant issue for supporting the national economy in those countries . Agricultural production includes the production of food for humans and livestock, in addition to the raw materials needed for the industrial process. Since the ancient time till now, there are several agricultural development revolutions; the first agricultural revolution was by Egyptian and Greek ancient civilizations that had reflected interesting of the ancient people in the development of agricultural methods, where papyri indicating the develop irrigation systems from more than 6000 BCE.

Egyptians and Greeks developed several agricultural machinery and equipment, for example, tympanum, pumps, Shadouf, and Sakai . The second agricultural revolution was showed during the 17th century that followed the end of feudalism in the continent of Europe. Furthermore, the third agricultural revolution had activated during 1930–1960 of the last century, where an expansion uses of mineral fertilizers to increase agricultural production, as well as increased usage of pesticides parallel with the development of various agricultural machinery . The fourth agricultural revolution occurred during the past two decades, which there was a significant development in information communication technology and AI. These technologies have facilitated controlling the equipment and devices remotely, where robots have been used in agricultural operations such as harvesting and weeding, and also drones have also been used to fertilize crops and monitor crop growth stages. Smart agriculture is a technology that relies on its implementation on the use of AI and IoT in cyber-physical farm management . Smart agriculture addresses many issues related to crop production as it allows monitoring of the changes of climate factors, soil characteristics, soil moisture, etc. The Internet of Things technology is able to link various remote sensors such as robots, ground sensors, and drones, as this technology allows devices to be linked together using the internet to be operated automatically . The main idea of precision agriculture is improving the spatial management practices to increase crop production on the one hand and avoid the misuse of fertilizers and pesticides on the other hand . Numerous research has been conducted on applying ANN models in smart irrigation water management . The estimation of reference evapotranspiration is one of the essential parameters for crop irrigation because it determines irrigation scheduling . The Penman-Monteith model is the most often used for estimating evapotranspiration, although it needs a large amount of data for accurate ET estimates. Because GIS is linked with remote sensing, artificial intelligence, GPS technology, and other technologies,potted blackberry plant it may conserve a significant quantity of water that would otherwise be needed for irrigation. Mohd et al. created SWAMP ; a web-based Geospatial DecisionSupport System ; and a graphical user interface based on widget technology for simple access to different views for the rice IWM Scheme.

The system offers data on irrigation water demand and supply, as well as irrigation efficiency and a water productivity index. One of the most significant aspects of this system is providing real-time information by visualizing the presented results. Climate-Smart Agriculture was created to address three key issues: food security, adaptation, and mitigation . CSA has received much interest, particularly in developing countries, because of its potential to improve food security and farm system resilience while lowering greenhouse gas emissions . This is particularly important in Africa, where economic development is based on agricultural expansion, which is the most susceptible to climate change . Smart Agriculture is an evolution of precision agriculture by innovating smart methods to achieve multifunctional regarding the farm management remotely supported by alternatives appropriate solutions of farm management in real-time. Fig. 1 showed that robots could fulfill essential roles in controlling the agricultural process and anticipate automatic analysis and planning so that the electronic cyber-physical cycle becomes semi-autonomous . European Union , highlighted the technologies importance of high-resolution satellite images, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , agricultural robots, and sensor nodes to collect data that could be integrated into future strategies of European agriculture smart farming signed in April 2019 by 24 EU countries . Parallel to expanding the various sensing methods for collecting, processing,and analyzing data, the volume of data used in agricultural management has become very big. Thus this leads to a decrease in the ability of the 4G network to connect all components of the smart network in remote locations. Recently, after the operation of the ultra-fast 5G switch, the process of transferring and processing data has become easy . Smart agriculture technology based on the Internet of Things technologies has many advantages related to all agricultural processes and practices in real-time, which include irrigation and plant protection, improving product quality, fertilization process control, and disease prediction, etc.. The advantages of smart agriculture can be summarized as follows: 1) Increasing the amount of real-time data on the crop, 2) Remote monitoring and controlling of farmers, 3) Controlling water and other natural resources, 4) Improving livestock management, 5)Accurate evaluation of soil and crops; 6)Improving agricultural production. This work aims to review published articles on the techniques above with regards to smart farming, in addition, highlight some approaches to smart farming in developing countries.The current work considered a large number of research topics to explore scientific methods relating to smart farming. Consequently, this work covered many aspects regarding the agricultural practices, decision-making, and technologies involved. We have used several sources from various scientific publishers such as Springer, Elsevier, Wiley, MDPI, etc. The sources varied from books, book chapters, conference proceedings, and articles, in addition to research project reports. Thus, this work has relied on 58 published documents, most of which were published during the last three years, and the authors from different countries worldwide. Meanwhile, a particular focus was dedicated to some smart agriculture approaches in the Africa continent. Subsequently, the review highlights the main components of smart farming, such as IoT, the role of internet connection, and smart sensing.

The national media again picked up on this message with tree planting only noted as a further mitigation measure

The inclination to align publications with the values and needs of agribusiness and present new product information as reportage, it suggests, reduced trust and supported the maintenance of the status quo in agricultural practice. Morris et al. compared the framing of antibiotic use in animal agriculture within national and sectoral publications in the UK. This highlighted the emphasis placed on implications for human health across outlets. It also, however, identified a distinct framing of the issue within the farming press which itself highlights the perceived importance of the media within the sector. This framing centred on the strength of public scrutiny and the consequent need for ‘informed and responsible’ decisions that successfully maintain consumer confidence. In her analysis of environmental discourses within German farming media, McHenry showed that environmental problems were commonly played down when established farming practices were ‘blamed’ for, or implicated in, them. However, pro-environmental discourses were utilised when they ‘served the interest of farmers’ . She also described how internally diverse elements of the farming sector press can be. Media analysis is less common in relation to trees and the forestry sector, fodder grow system however, Takala et al used print media analysis across scales – regional newspapers and sectoral magazines – to identify four primary discourses within the representation of Finnish forestry.

A ‘wood production’ discourse has remained a dominant force in the sector despite the growth of alternative discourses emphasising a broader, multifunctional understanding of forestry: demonstrating how well-established framings can persist in sectoral media. Media coverage of urban forestry has also received some attention from researchers . Conway and Jalali describe how urban trees have been framed within local media by their provision of aesthetic benefits and role in ecological restoration, along with their connections to and values for specific communities. These positive frames were countered, however, following a storm event after which the damage they caused and the cost of clearing up debris dominated their framing. In this paper our analysis explores how tree planting, especially for climate change mitigation and adaptation, is covered by the farming print media, with reference to wider media interest in scientific research on the issue. Farmers Guardian and Farmers Weekly are not available as digitised versions in the Nexis News database; hence our samples are based on paper copies of the two publications across four sample periods. We took two initial samples of issues of both Farmers Guardian and Farmers Weekly, each spanning a three-month period encompassing high-level policy and academic activity surrounding tree planting and climate change. The first sample covered a period starting a month prior to the publication of the UK CCC ‘Net Zero’ report  and ending in the month prior to the publication of the Bastin et al. paper . The second sample extended over a period beginning with the publication month of the Bastin et al. paper and running to the month following the IPCC report on ‘Climate Change and Land’. This second sample period also encompassed publication of the National Farmers Union ‘Achieving Net zero’ report , which also placed significant emphasis on farm carbon storage through tree planting.

We took these two initial samples to look in depth at media coverage of tree planting and to track short-term change during this period of intense and high impact international and national debate on climate change and tree planting. To track longer term changes in coverage we took two further samples, one year and two years after our first sample . Resource constraints meant that we could not access paper copies of Farmers Guardian for the 2020 and 2021 sample periods . For these two further samples we only included Farmers Weekly, the most widely distributed and read publication, but we are confident that the four sample periods covered by Farmers Weekly allowed us to consider how the narrative surrounding tree planting changed over time. In total, our analysis encompassed 74 issues of these two publications. Table 1 outlines the number of issues in each of the four samples and provides some descriptive statistics related to article counts in each. We included all non-advertising content within our analysis including feature articles, letters, opinion pieces, editorial, and news items – all of which herein we refer to as ‘articles’. Our exploration of the coverage of tree planting, or ‘woodland creation’, within the UK’s farming print media found that such topics occupy only an extremely small proportion of the pages of two key publications. Across our four samples less than 2% of articles focussed, or even commented, on tree planting.Where these subjects are covered, most articles only mention the topic in passing.While we might not expect tree planting to feature to an equal extent in the farming press as other core agricultural matters , it does receive an extremely low amount of coverage.

If we accept that media outlets and elements of society co-produce accepted group norms, values, and practices, this suggests that tree planting and woodland creation are simply not considered as a currently significant or legitimate element of farming culture and practice. Given that farmers are not only responsible for the management of extensive existing woodlands, but also their aforementioned position as managers of the vast majority of land that could potentially be afforested, this can be seen as a significant problem. Within our sample, coverage, including pieces that focused fully on tree planting, was greatest during the period which saw substantial relevant policy and research activity – that is S2. One alternative, less problematic, potential explanation for the virtual absence of coverage during S3 might be the prominence of the covid-19 pandemic at that time. April to June 2020 was a period of widespread restrictions and heightened concern about the disease which provided important content for media outlets across all professional sectors and at local and national scales. However, as coverage of all traditionally core dimensions of farming continued throughout the pandemic, it appears more likely that trees – let alone tree planting as a pathway to climate change mitigation – have not yet made their way onto the agenda of the farming sector. It seems unquestionable that greater coverage of trees, tree planting and ‘woodland creation’ is needed in the farming sector press if any substantive change in land use is to become evident. Much like the analysis of McHenry , we found quite internally diverse coverage. The farming sector press in the UK over 2019, 2020 and 2021 presented two sets of relatively polarised perspectives and associated messages on tree planting and woodland creation. A generally negative perspective is constructed around the view that climate change will not be solved by replacing agriculture with trees, that the real asset status of forestry is inflating already high agricultural land values out of reach of many farming businesses, and that government incentives for tree planting are not fit for purpose and do not address the poor economic potential that trees and woodlands offer.

Much of this negative coverage takes the form of opinion pieces or letters. A more positive perspective is predicated around two themes. First, that there are opportunities for trees to enhance the farming unit and the agri-environment, and second,chicken fodder system rare acknowledgements that woodland creation on farmland can intrinsically be a positive step towards combatting climate change. Our initial two samples of articles in Farmers Weekly and Farmers Guardian were taken during a period coinciding with the publication of a number of high-level policy and science outputs and thus intense and widespread debate of the role of tree planting in fighting climate change. These received significant attention in the UK’s national media but generated relatively little attention within the farming press itself. The UK CCC Net Zero report published in May 2019 discussed the role of woodland creation on UK agricultural land in decarbonising the economy, among several other climate change mitigation and adaption measures. This tree planting message was widely picked up in the national media . However, reflecting once again perceptions within the sector regarding the core elements of farming, coverage of this report in the farming press focussed mainly on the messages surrounding reducing livestock numbers and meat consumption rather than the role of tree planting on agricultural land. The Bastin et al. paper published in July 2019 took a global view of tree planting for climate change mitigation, arguing that large swathes of agricultural land across the world was suitable for tree planting. The UK national media again widely picked up on this message but few made links to implications for UK agriculture. In particular, how this woodland expansion may be achieved was more or less ignored by the national media coverage. Given the potential implications of the finding of the Bastin et al. paper for UK agriculture, it is perhaps surprising that there was no direct coverage of it in the farming press at the time. The national media also published a range of critical responses to the Bastin et al. paper immediately after the initial public attention; much of that echoed some of the themes identified in our analysis. Trees can only work as a “most effective solution” for climate change if they are not misused as an offset for continued emissions elsewhere ; an argument that is very similar to the worries of farmers getting disproportionately saddled with outsourced emission reductions from other sectors of the economy. There was, however, a secondary wave of criticism which went without coverage by either national media or farming press.

A range of scientific comments were published months after the original paper, primarily arguing that the calculation methods used by Bastin et al. were incorrect and significantly overstated the potential of carbon sequestration via tree planting . As a result, the authors issued an erratum in 2020, clarifying and changing some of the original statements . Neither popular nor sectoral media reported this. The IPCC Climate Change and Land report published in August 2019 placed great emphasis on reducing emissions from food production e.g., through reductions in livestock numbers and moves to plant-based diets.As with the UK CCC report a few months earlier, this was reflected in several articles in the farming press where the anti-meat agenda formed the main topic of the article, and planting trees was only mentioned in passing. The NFU, a central institution within the farming sector with considerable media presence, published their Achieving Net Zero report at the start of September 2019, outlining how the UK farming sector intends to reach net zero by 2040. Increasing farm tree cover is, together with enhancing soil carbon storage, seen as the main pillar to boost carbon sequestration on farms. The national media, focused primarily on the claim in the report that this does not need to come at a cost to beef production . The coverage of the NFU report by the farming press speaks positively about the “unique position” of the UK’s farming sector to become a role model in producing “the most climate friendly meat in the world”. The principal messages from these high-level policy documents that were interpreted and reported in the farming press were perceived, or framed, as ‘attacks’ on agriculture. The coverage of these reports related principally to theme one , with much of the coverage reactionary in nature, critically overlooking some of the other recommendations of these reports, such as the potential for agroforestry to assist with decarbonising farming and the wider economy. Much of the coverage of these reports doesn’t examine how the agricultural sector in the UK might address some of their findings. Only the NFU Net Zero report was presented positively by the farming press, highlighting the complementarities between tree planting and implementation of other efficiency measures on farms. This perhaps demonstrates the strength of established interests within the farming media. Much like the findings of McHenry , our analysis suggests the farming press play down or exclude the messages of these major reports when the farming sector is criticised and promote positive messages that maintain the existing position, structure and values of the sector. Overall, the UK’s farming press successfully continued to steer a steady course for the sector through the ‘storm’ created around it by major policy works and scientific analyses.

Pursuingclimate neutrality is regarded as an important opportunity for primary producers

The mine has socio-cultural value, in terms of place identity and the identity of community members . For the policies to be seen as just, these identity-related issues need to be understood and recognized. Studies on farmers’ perceptions of agri-environmental policy implementation highlight the identity and socio-cultural aspects of farming purposes and practices . According to these studies, farmers feel that their identity and values are threatened by agri-environmental policies and changes in farming practices. However, the ideals of good farming are diversifying , which also indicates the needto recognize diversity in identities. While farmers’ experiences of blame and guilt in relation to climate change are under-explored, in the Dutch context, van der Ploeg discusses farmers’ feelings of unjust blame with regard to nitrogen emissions. These feelings stem, on the one hand, from the highly specialized and export-oriented organization of farming in the Netherlands, which the farmers see as too vulnerable, damaging the landscape and producing profits for parties other than the farmers. On the other hand, consumers who do not understand the hard work of farmers do not want to pay enough for products to compensate for that work, and place increasing demands on them. These perceptions paint farmers as powerless victims, with little responsibility for the current situation and little power to act differently,dutch buckets which can negatively impact the recognition of farmers’ agency in society.

A recent Finnish study has also shown that two thirds of Finnish people find the discussion about climate change to be accusatory towards the regular Finnish person . The study also suggests that people who feel they are being blamed for climate change do not feel motivated to engage in pro-environmental action. A previous study on Finnish farmers reported similar results . It is important to explore what motivates farmers’ feelings of unfairness and injustice in terms of their role in society and how they can be alleviated. Farmers’ feelings of not being recognized or understood can be linked to the wider socio-cultural context. An important element of recognitive justice concerns the recognition of different ways of knowing in policy-making and agricultural knowledge systems. Geoghegan and Leyson and Clifford and Travis have advocated a broader understanding of climate change that considers different ways of knowing, including farmers’ local expertise and place-based climate knowledge. Farmers’ and indigenous peoples’ knowledge can serve as a valuable contribution to nature conservation and climate change adaptation,complementing knowledge from different sources . Furthermore, the wider socio-cultural context reveals a variety of mundane issues, related to adopting climate mitigation-focused or other environmentally beneficial farming practices,such as social goals, related to better work-life balance and family life or farm location and machinery-related constraints.These interlocking issues may make changes in farming practices difficult, as well as making it difficult to communicate properly with people outside the farming context. The recognition of different place-based identities, ways of knowing, and other sociocultural issues is directly linked to procedural justice, which concerns the fairness of institutional and decision-making processes.

One goal of this aspect of justice is a balanced accounting of the different perspectives, interests, and goals related to the issue at hand, and ensuring equal opportunities to participate in decision-making processes . In the mining transition, procedural justice concerns the involved participation of the affected community in the planning of the transition , as participation opportunities are strongly related to the acceptance of decisions . Participatory inequality is often produced by structural conditions . In the context of state- and EU-level agri-environmental policies, farmers’ opportunities to participate often come through farmers’ unions in corporatist settings . In Europe in particular, the surveillance and sanctions of agricultural subsidies may appear to farmers as bureaucratic and lacking in procedural justice . Because of the challenging climate conditions in Finland and a relatively short growing season of 125–180 days, milk and beef production has historically played an important role in the agricultural sector, comprising 50% of the agricultural gross return . Finland is one of the northernmost grain-producing countries in the world. Almost all agricultural land is located above 60◦ N, and the production structure varies. While the southern part contains significant grain production areas, the northern part, through grass production, focuses more on ruminant husbandry, including dairy. The total agricultural land area of Finland is 2.3 million hectares, of which 35% are managed grasslands . Finnish farms have traditionally been relatively small, stemming partly from the times after World War II, when migrants from the lost Karelian region resettled into what is currently Finland. Since Finland joined the EU in 1995, structural development, in terms of growing farm sizes, has been quite rapid. The average farm size is currently 46 ha.

However, currently, only 5% of all farms have over 150 ha of agricultural land, and the largest size category is 25–50 ha, with 25% representation . In 2016, the average farm size in the EU was 16.6 ha and two-thirds of the farms are less than 5 ha in size. Since 1995, the number of dairy farms in Finland has declined at a yearly rate of 6.5% . In 2019, only 12% of the 46,827 farms were engaged in milk production . Structural changes have also increased the efficiency of milk production. Despite the decline in the number of milking cows since 1995, the quantities produced have remained stable. In 2018, there were approximately 270,000 dairy cows that produced 2.285 billion liters of milk . This is under 2% of total milk production in the EU area. The average number of dairy cows per farm is 39. However, there is considerable variation. One-fifth of the cows are found in farms with 50–74 dairy cattle, which is the most common size category. Only 2% of cows are on farms with over 300 milking cows . The average age of a Finnish farmer is 53 years, and in the EU, more than half of farmers are over 55 years old . Most farms are family-owned, but the realization of generational change is not self-evident because of the unattractiveness of the agricultural sector among the young. In addition, decreasing milk consumption may reduce the attractiveness of dairy farming . Finnish consumption of dairy products, including liquid milk, is relatively high. On average, a Finn spends 17% of their food budget on dairy products . Dairy has traditionally been the most important product category among Finnish food exports, with a 20% share. Milk has been the only sector in the Finnish food industry with a positive trade balance since Finland joined the EU in 1995 . Valio Ltd. is the largest dairy company in Finland. Established in 1905 as a milk processing enterprise, it has a diverse selection of processed foods and beverages, including plant-based foods. Valio’s share within the dairy product market has traditionally been large, and it purchases approximately 80% of the raw milk in the market . Valio is owned by milk producers through cooperatives. Of the fourteen owner co-ops in Finland, five supply Valio. These five co-ops, with 4,700 dairy farmer members around Finland, own over 99% of the company.

Valio is governed by a Board and Governing Council, both having a strong representation of milk producers selected by the member co-ops. Currently, Valio is placing itself as the frontrunner in climate change mitigation and has set a target for itself—of reaching carbon neutrality by 2035 . The underlying motivation within Valio to undertake the carbon neutrality initiative has been to tackle the challenge of climate change. However, this is also a way to maintain consumer satisfaction.In the general discourse, farmers often reported feeling that they and their livelihood were blamed for environmental damage. Based on research,grow bucket the management deduced that enhancing carbon sequestration efforts offered a chance to change the general attitudes towards farmers as climate heroes rather than its destroyers . Valio’s objective is to reduce emissions from all phases of the dairy value chain. In addition to primary production, the measures target reductions in logistics and industrial processes. The three main ways to reduce emissions in primary production are to 1) enhance carbon sequestration into the soil, 2) enhance the circular economy by using manure to produce biogas for fuel and energy, and 3) reduce emissions from organic soils, that is, fields that were originally peatlands. In practice, Valio’s work with producers commenced in 2019 with training on carbon farming methods, aiming to engage farmers in applying suitable methods to enhance carbon sequestration and monitoring emissions from their fields. Carbon farming methods focus on improving grassland management by cultivating deep-rooted species, using manure as fertilizer, and utilizing certain harvesting techniques. Improved grassland and water management are the main solutions for reducing emissions from peatlands. Focusing on a prolonged grass cycle and year-round vegetation cover ensures these carbon farming measures are not too different from the ones that most farms have already implemented under the agri-environmental support scheme of the Rural Development Program of Mainland Finland. However, carbon farming takes these measures one step further to improve soil conditions. In 2020, approximately 300 producers participated in a carbon farming training event. Valio also released an application that producers could use to monitor the carbon balance of their farms.

The calculation methods developed by Valio are still in the validation/certification process. Participation in the program is voluntary, without any specific incentives. At present, Valio offers a responsibility premium that is linked to efforts to improve animal welfare. An objective has been set to have every farm on board by 2035, but the challenges to this are significant. The variety in farm size, location, and future plans makes it difficult to offer one-size-fits-all solutions. Our study is based on qualitative methodology. We used a case study approach , to investigate Valio’s carbon-neutral milk chain program, and provide new insights into carbon farming practices and farmers’ attitudes and perceptions related to carbon-neutral dairy farming. Based on this case, it is possible to outline relevant policy instruments supporting a future transition towards carbon-neutral dairy farming, and the findings of this study can be broadened to other similar contexts of carbon neutrality and justice. The sample for the case study consists of farmers who supply milk to the dairy co-op, Valio. The interviewed farmers comprised both those who participated in Valio’s carbon farming training and those who did not. We conducted 17 interviews and interviewed 18 farmers . During the time of the interviews, seven farmers had already participated in the program, whereas 11 had not. However, most of them had intentions to take part in the trainings. The age of the farmers ranged from 32 to 59 years. Both small and large farms were represented: the number of cattle varied from 15 to 180 milking cows, and the total land area under cultivation, including owned and rented land, varied from 42 to 200 ha. As additional, but marginal income sources, some farms had forestry, contracting services, or sales of grain or grass fodder. Several farmers had active or frozen investment plans, while others, usually older farmers, were certain of being the last active generation in business. The majority of the farms were single family-owned, while a few had established joint companies with siblings or neighbors. The interviews consisted of four themes, which were based on the dimensions of justice: distributive, recognitive, procedural, and restorative justice. Within these themes were included many different questions related to emission reduction and carbon farming. There were discussions about opportunities, obstacles, challenges, and concerns. Additionally, the division between winners and losers due to the policy, and possible compensations, was also discussed. However, the interviews were guided by the interviewee’s own speech and narration, in accordance with the principles of the qualitative thematic interviews. The duration of the interview varied from one-and-a-half to 2 h. The interviewers were Antti Puupponen, Annika Lonkila, Kaisa Karttunen and Anni Savikurki. The research data were analyzed using content analysis, a general qualitative method that combines data-based and theoretical analysis . The data were coded and separated using NVivo.

More recent studies have focused on smart farming in general

For example, Long et al. explored the barriers to the adoption and diffusion of technological innovation for climate-related smart agriculture in Europe and specifically in the Netherlands, France, Switzerland and Italy. Carrer et al. investigated the factors influencing the adoption of farm management information systems by Brazilian citrus farmers. Morris et al. , focusing on pastoral farmers across Wales, analysed the interconnectedness between farm diversification and technology adoption, with farm strategy as the central focus. Furthermore, Caffaro and Cavallo considered the roles of objective and subjective factors in the adoption of smart farming technologies in a sample of Italian farmers from the Piedmont region . Finally, Gittins et al. investigated the benefits and challenges associated with the adoption of new farm management technologies and software adoption in the UK livestock sector. Overall, these prior studies have suggested that the rate of adoption and perceived barriers relate to a specific innovation, to the farmer himself/herself and to the specific context . Factors depending on the specific type of innovation are related to the financial costs and economic benefits expected from the adoption of the new technology; the risks connected with this adoption; the advantages in terms of prestige, convenience and satisfaction; its consistency with the needs of adopters; the difficulties and complexity connected to the understanding and maintenance of the technology; and the observability of the innovation results . Factors related to the farmer are connected to his/her sociodemographic characteristics, hydroponic nft channel with the most important of which affecting the adoption of new technologies being farmers’ age, educational level, income, farm size, technological skills and actual use of technologies .

Finally, the adoption of new technologies is influenced by context-specific factors, such as political and social pressures, the national context and the regulatory environment . This study was conducted in the mountainous rural area of Valtellina, Valchiavenna and Alto Lario in the Lombardy region, close to the border with Switzerland . The area is characterized by a specific geographical conformation: the altitude varies from approximately 198 to 4000 m above sea level, and this area has a relevant east-west extension covering 3,212 km2 . More than 70% of the provincial territory is located 1500 m above sea level, and only a small portion is urbanized. Most of the area is composed of natural and forest areas , while the agricultural area covers only 7.4% of the total area . Nonetheless, farming activities represent an important economic source of income in this area. In 2016, 17% of the companies belonged to the agricultural sector, second only to the commercial sector, which accounted for 21% . The agricultural sector is also important for youth employment: 11% of young entrepreneurs operate a business in the agricultural sector, second only to tertiary companies.Agriculture is mainly based on traditional products of animal origin, such as the Bresaola of Valtellina GPI, Bitto PDO and Casera PDO cheeses, which are marketed in national and international markets . According to the last national census, livestock farms represented 44% of all farms, a percentage that seems in line with the average regional value .

Despite their economic importance, the number of livestock farms decreased from 1982 to 2010, on average accounting for 35%, one of the highest rates in the Lombardy region compared to the other provinces. In this case study, among livestock farms, dairy farms showed the smallest decrease , and unlike sheep, pig and poultry farms, the decrease in the number of dairy farms has been partially accompanied by a decrease in the number of animals , showing a general increase in farm dimensions and the withstanding of the dairy farming system . According to estimates, livestock products in the area account for approximately 63% of gross products sold, confirming the importance of bovine dairy farms for the local rural economy. As is typical in the alpine landscape, farming activities are performed in valleys, which are characterized by the presence of stable meadows interspersed with cultivated fields, particularly those containing corn for fodder production, and at higher altitudes, the farming system is based on pastures. The integration of valley agriculture and mountain pastures based on dairy farming systems is still of economic value and of important cultural and identity significance for the whole territory, representing a significant environmental and naturalistic heritage . Compared to other areas in the Lombardy region, only approximately 6% of farms have declared, according to the last national census, that they use computers and ICT devices for farm management, while the regional average is approximately 17%. Farms tend to use ICTs more to manage administrative services and crop systems than to manage herd production . In contrast, internet usage by farmers in the area is in line with the average regional value of 3% . With respect to farm size, more than half of the sample had less than 50 cows under lactation , 27.0% had from 50 to 100 cows, and only 8.0% of the sample had more than 100 cows. As shown in Table 1, the farmers from the cooperative seem to be younger and better educated than those farmers localized in other mountain areas. When asked, the cooperative managers confirmed that there had been important generational turnover in the last 10 years.

At the beginning of the interview, a brief explanation of the purpose of the study was provided to participants. The questionnaire was structured into two sections. The first section included questions on farmers’ characteristics, such as their gender, age, educational level, farm size in terms of the number of cows, professional use of a smartphone and expectations for the future of their farm. To explore farmers’ use of smartphones for professional duties, participants were first asked whether they owned a smartphone and for how long. Then, we provided a list of potential reasons for using a smartphone for farm management purposes and asked participants to indicate for which reason they were using their smartphones. For each reason, respondents were asked to express their frequency of use using a scale ranging from 1 = never to 5 = very often. To avoid any bias, there was also the possibility for them to mention any other reason not included in the list. Furthermore, to assess farmers’ expectations, participants were asked to rate how they see the future of their farms on a 5-point interval scale ranging from “very pessimistically” to “very optimistically”. The second section of the questionnaire sought to highlight the psychological measures that are expected to delineate farmers’ attitudes towards the use of technological devices, such as technophobia and technophilia, perceived obstacles and motivations for use. Farmers’ technophobia and technophilia were assessed by developing a specific scale considering the extant literature , which combines several statements of the “Technophobia and Technophilia Questionnaire – TTQ” proposed by Martínez-C´ orcoles et al. . The scale used in the current study was based on six items concerning farmers’ technophobia and technophilia towards new technologies. A five-point Likert scale with responses ranging from 1 to 5 was used to record participants’ responses. To investigate the perceived obstacles to the use of technological devices,based on the previous literature , we developed a ten-item scale including the constraints that hamper the adoption of new equipment and technologies on farms. Participants were asked to express their agreement using a scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree for each item. Finally, following the extant literature , farmers’ motivations to use technological devices were investigated by developing a scale with ten items concerning the most important benefits that farmers perceive from the use of technologies in their daily work and that may drive the farmers’ adoption of new equipment and technologies.

The results showed that attitudes towards new technologies are affected by age, educational level, farm size, actual smartphone usage for professional duties and optimistic expectations for the future of the farm. Educational level, farm size, smartphone usage and expectations for the future increased significantly across clusters from the first cluster of technophobes to the third cluster of technophiles. Moreover, age significantly decreased from the first cluster to the other clusters. Therefore, our findings suggest that older farmers with lower educational levels, smaller farms, less frequent smartphone usage for professional duties, nft growing system and more pessimistic feelings regarding the future of their farm are less willing to adopt new technologies. These farmers do not have the knowledge and confidence to understand the benefits related to the use of technologies for breeding. To overcome these issues, considering that “information is the key to the diffusion of innovations” , new forms of presentation and learning may be developed by service providers and policy makers to address the needs of these adverse technophobe farmers, who constitute a relevant part of the population. This innovation process is of great importance since technophilia, or the propensity to use new technologies, plays a fundamental role in the sustainable development of mountain farming and breeding. Although our results cannot be generalized to all mountain areas and to the whole mountain area itself, we found several elements that are in line with the previous literature . More specifically, in terms of age, our findings corroborate previous evidence showing the existence of a negative relationship between age and the adoption of new technologies, probably because older farmers have shorter career horizons than do younger farmers and, therefore, are less motivated to innovate.With reference to educational level, the results are consistent with the previous literature reporting that less educated farmers are less confident and less inclined to use new technologies . Considering farm size, we found that technophobe farmers have smaller herds, as reported in the literature, probably because smaller farms do not create adequate economies of scale and incentives for the adoption of new technologies for farm management . The owners of larger farms are more able to absorb the associated costs and risks. With respect to smartphone usage, technophobe farmers had the lowest frequency of use of smartphones for professional duties, meaning that farmers who are less confident in using technological devices have fewer technological skills and are more likely to have a negative attitude towards new technologies and be more reluctant to innovate .

Although our findings related to age, educational level and farm size have been analysed in previous papers , some novelties of our study are worth emphasizing. First, we focus on a sample of mountain dairy farmers. Second, we propose a clustering analysis of the farmers based on three attitudinal determinants: technophobia and technophilia, perceived obstacles, and motivations to use. To date, this approach has not been applied to farming system analysis, even if understanding the underlying factors that affect the adoption of technologies is imperative to allow policy makers to develop more effective and targeted policies. Farming systems in Europe are experiencing multiple adverse shocks and stresses, such as weather extremes, price fluctuations and changes in policies and regulations. Under these multiple shocks and stresses, improving or even maintaining generally mediocre levels of sustainability of farming systems is increasingly challenged . The presence of critical thresholds adds dynamic complexity for farming system actors and policy makers. This is because beyond such thresholds, drastic system transformations may occur that are difficult to anticipate and to manage. For instance, the speed and scale of system processes after exceeding a critical threshold may be incompatible with the adaptation capacities of current institutions . Exceeding a critical threshold is most often undesirable as it generally leads to lower sustainability levels, e.g. a decline in biodiversity and human well-being .Moreover, this state with lower sustainability levels may be more persistent resulting in reduced options to improve sustainability. Timely knowledge on critical thresholds is therefore needed to prevent exceeding them , but it is often difficult to anticipate the exceedance of a critical threshold . In absence of clear knowledge on thresholds, Walker and Salt propose to work with thresholds of potential concern that inform management goals that aim to avoid those thresholds, without knowing exactly where they lie. In either case, the threshold level being known exactly or being a TPC, Monitoring is needed in order to detect the closing in on a critical threshold.

It is also identified as a major knowledge gap by other policy researchers

The number of participants in the control group should be twice as many as that of the treatment group to ensure a higher number of matched samples. Consequently, the target number of study participants was 1152. Data from the DCP and the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development were used during the pilot testing of the interview schedule and the sampling of survey participants. As a result, 5 districts and 15 communes were selected from Kien Giang, Soc Trang, and Long An provinces, with three communes being selected from each district. The districts of each province were selected based on the data of the area planted before and after 15 November 2019 and on the ratio of salinity-affected area to total salinity area in the province. Thus, the selected districts have the following characteristics: they are more heavily damaged by salinity relative to other districts in terms of the proportion of affected areas to the total area, and they have farmers who adopt early planting. Within each district, the three most salinity-affected communes were chosen as study sites. Within each commune, the sampling distribution was determined by the proportion of salinity-affected areas to the total salinity-affected area. The sample households were chosen using a two-stage sampling strategy. The first stage involved dividing the households into two groups, namely, early planter households and non-early planter households. In the second stage, hydroponic grow table sample households from each group were selected by simple random sampling. The survey yielded slightly more study participants than the initial target: 412 early planters and 764 non-early planters.

The European Commission,when presenting its legislative proposals for the Common Agricultural Policy post-2020, emphasised the aim to better support the resilience of agricultural systems in the European Union . Phil Hogan, then Commissioner for Agriculture and Rural Development , declared that the CAP would deliver on “genuine subsidiarity for Member States; ensuring a more resilient agricultural sector in Europe; and increasing the environmental and climate ambition of the policy” . This strong emphasis on resilience is based on the concern that the agricultural sector should be supported in responding to current and future economic, societal, and environmental challenges and uncertainties. Building on Meuwissen et al. , we define the resilience of a farming system as its ability to manage change by responding and adjusting itself, while maintaining essential functions. Despite the resonance of the concept of resilience in agricultural policy making circles, less is known about its concrete implications for the designing of public policy. Previous research focused mainly on how to enable resilience at farm level: in individual farms or in farm management , or on individual farmers’ strategies to anticipate or respond to shocks or uncertainties . These studies acknowledge the role of public policies by describing how they, as part of a broader social context, affect e.g. production processes, decisions about diversification, and farmers’ possibilities to adapt strategies, and, therefore, a farm’s resilience. However, a conceptualisation of how policies enable or constrain resilience remains unspecified. The extent to which the CAP and its national implementations support resilience, or even constrain it, is currently unclear. For instance, the CAP relies heavily on various instruments to increase farmers’ income in the short term, but less is known about how these instruments affect resilience in the long term. In order to actually contribute to a resilient agricultural sector, a more comprehensive understanding is required about how the CAP affects the resilience of farming systems. The question of how to develop policies that enable a system’s ability to overcome current and future challenges is not specific to agriculture.As argued by Biesbroek et al. , much of the resilience literature tends to treat policy and governance as black box concepts; the actual causal relations through which policies enable or constrain a system’s resilience remain largely uncharted territory.

This knowledge gap resulted in various efforts to identify resilience-enhancing characteristics of policies . The literature, however, focuses mainly on how the policies themselves can become more resilient; an agreed-upon approach to systematically analyse how policies affect a system’s resilience is still lacking. Furthermore, these characteristics are not fine-tuned to farming systems. To address this research gap, this study analyses whether and how the CAP enables or constrains farming systems’ resilience. We address the research gap by proposing a new heuristic: the Resilience Assessment Tool . This heuristic consists of a set of indicators to assess the capability of a policy to support the resilience of a farming system. The tool was inspired by Gupta et al. ’s Adaptive Capacity Wheel, which allows users to assess the capability of governance institutions and policies to enable society to adapt to climate change. Subsequently, we apply the ResAT to examine the perceived effects of the CAP and its national implementation on the resilience of an intensive arable farming system in De Veenkoloni¨en, the Netherlands. Two focus groups with policymakers and stakeholders were organised to discuss and validate the findings of the ResAT analysis. Finally, we discuss several key reflections that emerge from our analysis. To analyse how policies affect the resilience of the agricultural sector, we chose a farming system as the level of analysis. A farming system is the system hierarchy level above the individual farm: it is a local network of comparable types of farms and other actors that interact formally and informally and are responsible for private and public goods in a specific regional context . Furthermore, farming systems are open systems and their activities are linked to social networks, economic processes, and the agro-ecological context in which the systems operate. Farming systems serve different essential functions for society through the provision of private goods and public goods . However, they may be subject to economic, social, institutional, and environmental challenges that confront the ability of these systems to maintain their functions. These challenges vary from sudden events or shocks to long-term stressors, which both can increase systemic vulnerabilities as well as provide opportunities.

As a next step, we conceptualise resilience in relation to these farming systems. The concept of resilience has become widespread in academic discussions and policy contexts across a diverse set of fields, such as ecology, disaster management, psychology, natural resource management, and agriculture and rural development . Resilience is understood in different ways within these fields. For instance, the understanding that resilience entails the capacity of a system to resist shocks or disturbances with the goal of rapidly returning to a perceived normal is particularly common in disaster management studies . In this respect, key aspects of resilience are a system’s resistance to perturbations and its ability to recover without experiencing change to existing functions afterwards . While this understanding links resilience to the ability to resist shocks and changes in the short-term, other studies, e.g. in the field of rural and agricultural studies, have suggested that resilience also consists of the capacity to adapt, or even transform, in response to external shocks or stresses . For example, Darnhofer highlights that managing a farm’s resilience also includes being capable of dealing with uncertainties through learning and adjusting responses to changing circumstances, and to fundamentally change components of farming systems when these prove dysfunctional. By including change as integral parts of resilience, resilience thinking offers a conceptual lens that accepts that change is omnipresent and often unpredictable in complex systems . Based on this broad understanding of resilience, we build on concepts rooted in social-ecological systems analysis to conceptualise farming system resilience as the system’s capacity to manage and respond to challenges, both foreseeable trends and unexpected events, while maintaining its essential functions of providing private and public goods. We also distinguish between three resilience dimensions , flood tray expressed in three different capacities: Robustness is the capacity of the system to resist external perturbations and to maintain previous levels of functionality, without major changes to internal elements and processes. 

Adaptability is the capacity of the system to adjust internal elements and processes in response to changing external circumstances. The system can continue to develop along the original trajectory, while maintaining important functionalities.Transformability is the capacity of the system to change fundamentally, particularly when structural changes in the ecological, economic, or social environment make the existing system untenable to provide important functionalities.Conceptualising resilience through robustness, adaptability, and transformability extends the understanding of resilience beyond only maintaining equilibrium; adjustments and change are also integral to a system’s resilience. Public policies are sets of interrelated decisions that governmental actors take regarding an issue. We follow Howlett ’s conceptualisation of public policy outputs as consisting of goals and instruments. Policy output refers to the direct results of governmental actors’ decision-making processes, which take the form of policy programmes, laws, or regulations. Policy output consists of goals and instruments that are interrelated and operate at different levels of abstraction. Policy goals are the aims and expectations that a policy pursues, and policy instruments are the means or techniques used to achieve these goals . These policy components interact with one another, leading to synergies, conflicts, or trade-offs that result in complex policy configurations with often unclear means-ends relations. This also means that certain policy components can enable the resilience of the system in one area, while constraining it in another area . The challenge for policymakers is then to discover how policy components can generate synergies and avoid trade-offs to support a system’s resilience. The resilience literature has identified various ways in which policies may enable resilience, particularly in the areas of risk and crisis management, resource management, and city planning. B´en´e et al. , for example, showed with their systematic literature review on urban resilience that multilevel or polycentric governance is vital for enhancing resilience.

Huitema et al. and Pahl-Wostl also underline the desirability of polycentric governance and how it enhances knowledge exchange and potentially synergy-enabling adaptations. Other scholars have pointed to the importance of accommodating self-organisation and knowledge networks or the encouragement of learning and experimentation . The topic of resilience has also received attention in the policy literature through questions about how to design policies that are capable of dealing with uncertainties and can support systems to overcome current and future challenges. For instance, Howlett highlighted that agility, improvisation, and flexibility are important policy features to adapt and to deal with surprising or uncertain futures. Likewise, Swanson et al. identified specific characteristics for policies to function under complex, dynamic, and uncertain conditions, such as variation through multiple policies to address the same issue to increase the likelihood of achieving desired outcomes in uncertain times, regular policy review processes to evaluate effectiveness and continuous learning, and pilots to test assumptions relating to emerging issues. Moreover, Daedlow et al. discussed factors that determine the resilience of natural resource governance systems. For instance, they revealed in their case study that external processes of change and disturbances with high uncertainty may prevent decision makers from adapting or transforming the governance system. They showed that the position, influence, and motivation of key decision makers can very much determine the outcome of a reorganisation process of a governance system. Despite these valuable insights, to date, the policy literature concentrates primarily on how to increase the resilience of policies rather than on how policies can improve systems’ resilience. Consequently, a systematic approach to analyse how public policies enable or constrain the three dimensions of resilience of complex systems remains largely uncharted territory. Moreover, there is no specific conceptualisation of how policies enable or constrain the resilience of farming systems. The ResAT is not a classic assessment tool in the sense that it measures the policy’s impact on resilience; instead, it allows for a qualitative policy analysis. We systematically analyse and interpret the policy output and its relation to the indicators for robustness, adaptability, and transformability enabling policies in the case study context. The analysis is based on qualitative content analysis and expert judgement, which requires a clear methodological approach that is systematic and transparent .

Our exploration of potential strategies to enhance resilience yielded three main insights

As a consequence, farming systems address multiple and sometimes competing objectives like increasing production, improving the quality of farmers’ livelihoods, and enhancing environmental sustainability. In trying to meet these objectives, farming systems in Europe are facing an increasingly broad range of environmental, economic, social and institutional challenges . Operating in this complex environment requires stakeholders to anticipate the challenges ahead and to prepare for them by enhancing the resilience of farming systems. One of the many farming systems working towards achieving long-term sustainability in an increasingly challenging environment is the farming system in the Veenkoloni¨en, in the Netherlands. Traditionally, this farming system has been dominated by the cultivation of starch potato in a rotation with cereals and sugar beets. A review of the starch potato production in the region conducted by Bont et al. found that the production of starch from potatoes accounted for up to 50% of the income of arable farms and supported more than 7000 direct and indirect jobs in the region. The presence of Avebe, an agro-industrial cooperative dedicated to starch processing, has resulted in stable prices and demand for the farmers in the area. Avebe is the only company in the Netherlands that processes starch from potatoes and currently has 1400 members that are supplying a steady flow of starch potatoes every year . Avebe receives roughly half of all its starch potato supply from the Veenkoloni¨en. This supply represents about one third of the global market share of the starch potato value chain .

All the starch potato growers in the Veenkoloni¨en own Avebe shares, which come with the obligation to deliver starch potatoes to Avebe . Avebe’s factories process the potatoes that are produced by all shareholders and sell the resulting starch or other products for an added value on the world market. The profits of Avebe then get redistributed back to the shareholders according to the volume and quality of starch potatoes they delivered, and the number of shares they own . So far, this synergy between Avebe and the starch potato farmers in the Veenkoloni¨en has proven successful and has helped farmers to overcome significant challenges thanks to innovation and vertical integration driven by Avebe . However, vertical grow rack there are growing concerns amongst local stakeholders in the Veenkoloni¨en that this success might be reaching its limits and that starch potato cultivation might stop being a profitable economic activity in the region . While the amount of starch potato produced and the cultivated area in the region have kept increasing, since 2000 the number of farms cultivating starch potatoes has decreased significantly. The substantial reduction in the number of farmers, potentially due to poor economic performance of smaller producers, raises questions about how resilient the system is and whether it will be able to withstand future challenges. This paper develops a simulation model to explore how this farming system might respond to future challenges. In simple terms, resilience describes the capacity of a system to absorb a disturbance and to reorganise itself in ways that allow it to operate under new conditions ;. A common way to conceptualise resilience is to think of the system moving about within a particular region in state space in which the system tends to remain within the same “stable state” or “basin of attraction” .

The various basins of attraction that a system may occupy within this region, and the boundaries that separate them, are known as “stability landscapes” . Complex systems are known to have multiple basins of attraction within a stability landscape , and resilience is often conceptualised in terms of the system potential to withstand disturbances without shifting from their current basin of attraction to a different one . When systems are affected by a disturbance, they might alternate between basins of attractions, return to the same configuration after a small disturbance or shift to a different basin of attraction after a large one . Failure to anticipate these shifts between basins of attraction can be costly and sometimes even catastrophic. An alternative to anticipating shifts between basin of attractions is to use simulation models to explore the impact disturbances have in the variables and processes that control the system’s behaviour . Complex systems are characterised by comprehensive mechanisms that push the system toward a particular basin of attraction. When affected by a disturbance, a chain reaction of changes through the system triggers feedback loop mechanisms that either move the system toward a different basin of attraction or help it to remain within the current one . The aims of this study were threefold. First, we aimed to explore the impact disturbances might have on the long-term performance of the starch potato farming system in the Veenkoloni¨en region. Second, we aimed to explore the feedback loops within the system structure that influence/condition the resilience of the system. Finally, our third goal was to use the insights gained to identify potential strategies that might help to increase the resilience of this farming system. The paper proceeds as follow. We start by describing the simulation model developed to characterise the starch potato system in the Veenkoloni¨en. Next, we elaborate on the steps we followed to use this model in the assessment of the resilience of the system. These sections are followed by the results and analysis sections where we summarise and reflect on the main insights gained from our research. The first aim of this study was to explore the impact disturbances might have on the long-term performance of the starch potato farming system in the Veenkoloni¨en region. The results of our study show that environmental challenges reducing starch potato yields were found to have a higher impact in the system and relatively small changes in yields might move the starch potato production and the farmers income to a different basin of attraction.

For instance, to shift the farmers income to a different stability domain farm cost will need to double while the same results are seen when yields decrease by 33.4% over a year . These results support the perception of the Veenkoloni¨en stakeholders who participated workshops organised as part of the SUREFarm project and indicated that the number of farmers will decline considerably if extreme weather events significantly decrease yields. These differences between the resilience to economic and environmental factors leads us to our second research question as we use the model to understand the feedback loops within the system structure that influence/condition the resilience of the system. As other authors have hypothesised, see for example Meuwissen et al., , the apparent resilience of the farming system in the Veenkoloni¨en is probably driven by its relation with Avebe. The simulation results indicate that this symbiotic relationship between Avebe and the farmers is indeed an enabler of resilience to economic challenges and that there is a clear difference in the system resilience to those disturbances the ‘cooperative benefit’ can help with and those it cannot. It is important to highlight that resilience resulting from this symbiotic relationship between farmers and Avebe might be bounded by other mechanisms. For example, when considering Avebe’s financial position it can be seen that the same cash reserves used by Avebe to support farmers during difficult times are also needed for innovation that is required to increase product value and maintain farmers’ competitiveness in the future. When yields are low R2 takes priority over R3 and R6. In those years, profit will be invested in paying the right price, rather than in innovation . However, if the disturbances are too severe, Avebe loses its ability to innovate as it depletes its cash reserves. When this threshold is crossed, the system experiences larger impacts for longer times and moves to new basins of attraction that are likely to be unsustainable for both Avebe and the farmers.

While resilience is often associated with sustainability, there are some scenarios in which resilience might undermine the sustainability of the system sustainability. For instance, resilience can be improved in the short term , at the expense of resilience and sustainability in the long term . This phenomenon occurs when the sustainability goals of policy makers are in conflict with the productivity goals of other actors in agricultural systems, including the farmers and agro-industries . Finding a right balance between sustainability and resilience is an important aspect of the dynamics between farmers and cooperatives that is not only relevant to the Veenkoloni¨en but also to other farming systems in Europe. It is also a clear example that decisions actors make regarding their resources are not only relevant for resilience in the short term, but also on the long term.First, it can be noticed that the number of cases in which the system remains within the same basin of attraction increases with the implementation of any of the resilience enhancing strategies that we tested. It can thus can be concluded that all the strategies could be expected to increase,vertical grow table to some extent, the size of the disturbance the system can withstand and hence increase resilience. The results also show that the proposed strategies are less effective for increasing resilience to environmental disturbances than to economic ones . This difference can be seen in the difference between the areas covered by open dots in Fig. 8A – 8F and the same area in Fig. 8G – 8L . For instance, a decrease of starch potato in the crop rotation by over 40%, or a decrease of the average yields by more than 30% , always resulted in a system shift to a different basin of attraction, regardless of how aggressively/successfully the strategies could be implemented. Finally, the results in Fig. 8 also show that S1 and S3 outperform S2 in their effectiveness for increasing resilience to all the disturbances examined.

The only considerable difference between the S1 and S3 was observed when analysing the resilience of the system to an increase in production costs of starch potato . In this case S1 outperforms S3 considerably and even moderate increases in the starch content increased the resilience of the system considerably. An important aspect of our analysis that requires further consideration is the role of randomness in the occurrence of extreme weather events. Currently we assumed equal probabilities for all potential disturbances in the tested intervals of magnitude and duration, but we recognise that some events are more likely than others. Introducing the effect of random events in the analysis might change not only our conclusions about the resilience of the system but also our observations regarding the effectiveness of strategies. Similarly, analysing the impact of stochasticity on innovation breakthroughs could also reveal new insights about the farming system and its potential development. Structural transformation is a fundamental challenge in economic development and key to overcoming food insecurity and poverty for the millions of households that work in agriculture . An extensive literature demonstrates the variety of constraints that hinder the transition of rural farms from subsistence to commercial production. Among these are price uncertainty , access to credit , and a lack of technical knowledge . These constraints affect input demand, as well as yields, sales, and income, contributing to the perpetuation of the agrarian status quo. Vertical coordination has the potential for fostering structural transformation of rural economies . In recent years, contract farming has emerged as a popular mechanism to encourage such vertical coordination . Farm production contracts can shift risk and the need for initial capital from small farming households to medium and large processors who are better able to manage these issues. In return, firms secure a stream of quality inputs for processing. While many see contract farming as a way to spur rural structural transformation and growth in local economies, the view is far from universal.As Bellemare and Bloem and Ton et al. point out, one reason for the lack of consensus on the impacts of contract farming in developing countries is that, up till now, studies have relied exclusively on observational data, and many have been limited to cross-sectional data. We present results from the first field experiment on contract farming in a developing country context.

The Rapid Rural Appraisal approach was used to gather information from 81 active households

The large variation in the selling price of guinea fowl observed depended on the region and period of the year. In southern Benin, guinea fowl was more expensive due to the proximity to the urban centers and the low availability of the birds in this region. As for Northern Benin, the reluctance of farmers to sell guinea fowl in the rainy season because of it coincided with the reproduction period of these birds coupled with the higher demand of the birds during the festive period including Chrismas, New Year celebration and Easter, are the causes of the hike in the selling price of guinea fowl. The price increase ranged from 180 FCFA to 725 FCFA on the average. However, white guinea fowl were generally sold at higher prices than other phenotypes because they were in greater demand during religious ceremonies. Houndonougbo et al. also found that white guinea fowl had a higher selling price than those of other phenotypes of guinea fowl. Guinea fowl eggs were generally sold between 65 FCFA and 150 FCFA . The egg-laying period in guinea fowl was seasonal and lasted from April to October. During this period, mature guinea fowl were likely to lay an average of 71  16 eggs distributed over 26–30 weeks at about 6–7 months of age. Contrary to this observation, guinea fowls have been reported to lay eggs during the dry season in Botswana . Egg incubation were mostly natural and lasted from 26 to 29 days while the duration varied from 26 to 28 days according to some authors.This incubation period also varied from 27 to 28 days in Ivory Coast and Bangladesh.This difference in duration can be attributed to the climatic conditions which differ from one country to another thus affecting embryonic development.

The average hatchability rate was 74%. This hatching rate was relatively similar to earlier report in Benin , dutch buckets but higher than what was observed in Zimbabwe as documented by Zvakare et al. . The average weight of guinea fowl obtained was lower than that obtained by Ogah in Nigeria, but higher than that reported in Ghana . This average weight varies by region. These variations in weight may be due to the environmental conditions which differ from one region to another and which can be favorable or not to the good growth of guinea fowls. In rural areas, a mortality rate of 10% was observed one week after hatching. This mortality rate could be as high as 22% at 3 months of age. To limit these mortalities, farmers used the bark and leaves of certain locally available plants which are macerated and included in the drinking water of guinea fowl. Some of these plants materials employed by farmers during the survey include Azadirachta indica and Khaya senegalensis. Old practices relating to the use of traditional medicine are still relevant because of the low income of farmers and their distance from urban centres. Nevertheless, the use of traditional medication still has its drawback in most cases due to non-precise diagnosis and medication dosage . Therefore, it would be necessary to verify the effectiveness of these ethno-veterinary plants in order to validate for a better recommendation . About the characterization of guinea fowl farming system, the results of the present study made it possible to identify four categories of guinea fowl farmers in Benin which differed based on location, sex, level of education, activity carried out and type of incubation. In Alibori region, where guinea fowl production in general constituted the primary occupation of respondents, followed by crop production, women were moderately involved in guinea fowl rearing. This result is explained by the involvement of more men in large ruminants production, which they believe was more profitable. In this region, the incubation of eggs was almost natural through the involvement of mother hens, ducks and turkeys.

On the other hand, women were fairly involved in guinea fowl farming in the region of Atacora where agriculture was the dominant activity but associated with guinea fowl production. Guinea fowl farming was mainly engaged in by men in Benin unlike the case of Zimbabwe where women were more involved in this sector. Individuals with a high level of education were involved in guinea fowl rearing as a secondary activity. These results suggest that guinea fowl production was mostly done by illiterates, who had more empirical experience in the field as also reported by Kwesisi et al. . In terms of comparison of the four groups of guinea fowl farmers, it can be deduced that cluster 3 showed the best performance. It is made up of mostly young farmers between 25 and 50 years of age with middle experience in guinea fowl breeding. Although most of the respondents in this group are represented in almost all regions, they are best found in the Borgou, Couffo and Mono regions. These guinea fowl farmers mostly adopt a semi-intensive breeding system and use artificial incubation to hatch their eggs better than others clusters. Cluster 4 farmers, who were better represented in Atlantique, Collines and Zou regions, took the second place based on these variables . The farmers in cluster 2 took the third position and those in cluster 1 who were relatively women occupy the last place in this classification. Any capacity building and support program should be aimed at these clusters of farmers in order to get more women involved in guinea fowl farming and ultimately increase the productivity of the species. However, in Botswana, Moreki et al. reported that women were mainly beneficiaries of guinea fowl projects. This situation, although deliberately targeted women, demonstrated that women can also raise guinea fowl. This last cluster had more illiterate farmers than all other groups. This is part of the reason for their poor performance. Nevertheless, this high rate of illiteracy, which is not peculiar to guinea fowl production, is a potential disadvantage for large-scale production of guinea fowl because of its negative influence on the adoption of new technologies .

Land reform programmes are initiatives in which nations attempt to correct inequalities in ownership and access to land, by re-allocating the land from the land-endowed to the landless , 2000; World Bank, 1975. Previous landowners may be compensated for their land, during the implementation of these initiatives. Globally, countries which implemented agrarian reform or land reform have struggled to attain synergy between the social and economic objectives of land reform programmes . In the past two decades, land reform implementation in South Africa experienced such a dilemma ; different sub-programmes were implemented with different objectives and a diversity of outcomes can be observed. In South Africa , the initial programmes were socially oriented, and this resulted in social diversity of new landowners. However, in recent years, the programmes aimed at establishing farmers with good economic performance by giving land mainly to those with financial resources to use it . Not only institutional drivers can be attributed to the existence of land reform farms since the farms also vary for example, in natural capital and physical capital endowments. Variations in institutional drivers, and natural and physical capital endowments of land reform farms are anticipated to influence agricultural land use and the success of policies and interventions implemented for further development of these farms . Farming system research is applied to better understand agricultural land use, its drivers and to design strategies for development . Further, farming system research focuses on decisions regarding production and consumption taken by a farming household . In this study, we consider a farming system to be “a population of individual farm systems that have broadly similar resource bases, enterprise patterns, household livelihoods and for which similar development strategies and interventions would be appropriate”.Identifying farming system types allows a shift from broader generalisation towards targeted, context-based development approaches based on identified challenges and opportunities, which may differ among types .

The types of variables used to explore farming system diversity vary and depend on the purpose of the classification . Farming system typologies are of two kinds: structural which focuses on structural variables and functional which focuses on decisions made by farmers regarding production and consumption . Statistical methods used to explore farming system diversity often include a combination of multivariate analysis with cluster analysis and Bayesian systems . These methods group farms around key characteristics with an aim to increase variation between groups and to decrease it within a group. To our knowledge, no studies have systematically classified farming system types in land reform farms of SA, grow bucket and we envisage that the results will contribute towards sustainable economic use of these farms. The aim of this study is to generate systemic knowledge on farming systems in land reform farms of the Waterberg District in South Africa . Towards this aim, we identified principal variables underlying the diversity in land use, classified farming system types, characterised the identified types, and analysed the drivers of the diversity among types. We conducted the study in the Waterberg District Municipality of the Limpopo Province, South Africa .In each of the surveyed farms, we targeted at least 15% of the ‘active households’ for data collection. A household was considered active when it had ‘at least one household member on a beneficiary list2 of a farm and also at least one household member involved in farm management or land use’. The distance between farms and the nearest urban centres were recorded and were considered proxy for ‘farm location’. Three locations were identified: the urban location at less than 16 km distance, peri-urban location between 16 and 40 km and rural location at above 40 km.

Using semi-structured questionnaires, we interviewed respondents who are either household heads or their representatives. We collected qualitative and quantitative data for the 2013/2014 agricultural year by asking recall data for the 12 months before the date of interview. Data about the agricultural activities being practiced being livestock farming , horticulture farming and crop farming , and combinations of these activities, and the land use associated with each of the agricultural activities, were collected under land use. Data about agricultural commodities produced, quantities produced, quantities sold and produce not for sale were collected under income generation. Data about the use of production factors and associated costs were collected under production costs. In the study area, production inputs were acquired mainly from formal markets, whereas agricultural produce was sold on both formal and informal markets. Remuneration of hired labour was pre-determined4 in this study, as it was governed by the Basic Conditions of Employment Amendment Act, no 20 of 2013 , 2014. This paper adopts the descriptions of formal and informal markets as given by Ferris et al. . Informal markets operate outside of the taxation system, with no prescribed quality standards and volumes of goods, whilst the opposite suffices for formal markets. Examples of informal markets for produce are sales which take place at farm gate, roadside, village and rural gathering, and examples of formal markets on the other hand, comprises retailers, fresh produce markets and livestock auction. For each of the agricultural commodities produced, data about the type of market used to sell the produce was collected under market type for produce. We conducted focus group discussions with representatives of active households to collect data about farm organisational arrangements, farm physical capital endowmentand households’ access to farms’ natural, physical, financial and social capitals. In farms owned by households individually, data about farm physical capital endowment was collected from the respondents. In instances where respondents were unsure, transect walks were taken to verify the existence of listed activities and to assess the extent of agricultural land use. To understand the drivers of farming systems, we cross-examined the findings of this study on farm organisational arrangements, farm physical capital endowment and market types for produce. The knowledge generated from those cross-examinations was used to make deductions about the influence which the aforementioned factors had on the presence and emergence of farming system types. Table 3 provides description of variables used for PCA.

Another way to improve nutrient utilization is to develop offshore integrated multi-trophic aquaculture

The concentration of TA was correlated with the CO2 flux in both months , suggesting the impact of CaCO3 dissolution/ precipitation. This situation was complex when we found that the correlations were positive in March but negative in April. The rapid increase in TA and decrease in pH with time in March , along with DO consumption and other GHG concentrations, may imply carbonate dissolution in the water column or on the sediment surface. If this assumption is correct, the fluctuation of TA concentration in the shellfish pond can be well explained by the balance of CaCO3 precipitation , which could decrease TA and carbonate dissolution, which could increase TA. In March, the carbonate dissolution may overwhelm the precipitation, and the TA and free CO2 can be enhanced simultaneously, along with the increase in DIC and decrease in pH. When the precipitation dominates the TA concentration in April , 1 mol CaCO3 precipitation would decrease 2 mol TA and increase 1 mol free CO2 , resulting in a negative correlation between TA and CO2 flux. Hence, shell formation may play an important role in budgeting CO2 emissions from shellfish farming systems. The inclusion of CO2 released during shell formation in the carbon trading system remains debated. A previous study estimated that the GHG footprint of oyster farming is 0.13 kg CO2-eq kg/protein, with the major source being N2O the oyster, and no emissions from fodder production and sediment release . Although we did not acquire biomass production from the constricted tagelus we studied, ebb flow trays the significant emission of non-CO2 GHG indicates that the estimation is much more complex than that in a non-fed culture.

We combined the results from March and April and found a positive correlation between POC concentration and DMS flux . Because we did not measure the phytoplankton biomass in the ponds, we assumed that phytoplankton abundance was directly proportional to the POC concentrations. Much more DMS was released in April than in March, suggesting that more microphytoplankton developed and subsequently dissociated in April, because the DMS was most likely derived from algae by viral infections, planktonic exudations, and sloppy feeding . This assumption is reasonable because solar radiation is stronger in April, which leads to stronger photosynthesis than that in March. However, more field studies in aquaculture systems are necessary to improve quantify DMS flux and its controlling factors. The variability of GHG emissions and nutrient concentrations between March and April indicates temporal uncertainty during the period of constricted tagelus aquaculture. We expected a reasonable effect on GHG emissions by the stocking density and survival rate , which influences the disturbance of sediment and biogeochemical processes . Our observations may represent a mediating result because the samplings were not conducted at the beginning of farming in winter, when there were few nutrient loadings and small individuals, nor were they conducted at the end of summer, when there was mature biomass and strong respiration. Taken together, changes in environmental parameters may regulate the spatial-temporal distribution of GHGs in constricted tagelus farming ponds. We deduced that farming mode-induced GHG release, such as nutrient loading, shell formation, and sediment perturbation by tagelus activity or wastewater draining, were the determining factors responsible for the higher GHG emissions than in the natural environment or traditional bivalve culture . Shellfish mariculture provides benefits, particularly in solving food security and promoting economic growth , or the filtration of particles, promoting nutrient recycling . However, the rapid expansion of production and industrialization has raised environmental concerns . In our cases, other than CO2, large quantities of non-CO2 GHG were observed during the constricted tagelus cultivation period, indicating the uncertainties of GHG emissions associated with fed shelled-mollusk aquaculture.

The additional feed and seawater input increased primary production in the microalgae pond and therefore amplified the potential for GHG production in the culture tanks. Additionally, nutrient fertilization can cause severe eutrophication in ponds, enriching sediments with organic matter. Another important benefit of shellfish aquaculture is that the formation and growth of calcareous shells are used as a CO2 sink; thus, the burial of sinking particles and the formation of shells from mariculture may have the potential to increase the storage of “blue carbon” . However, before entering into carbon trading schemes and planning an expansion of production, the carbon biogeochemical cycles and life cycle assessment in shellfish mariculture should be qualified and quantified because the accompanying respiration, fertilization, and changes in carbonate chemistry during shellfish farming would lead to a considerable source of atmospheric CO2 , which is usually not intuitive. Another environmental concern has been raised by the over application of fertilizers that introduce considerable nutrients into ponds, leading to nutrient enrichment and species loss in aquaculture and other ecosystems . These unutilized nutrients are rapidly transported to nearby estuarine sea waters via routine water exchange or accumulate in the soil, causing further GHG emissions . Thus, considering the significant GHG emissions from our study, the net harvest of tagelus mariculture can be an important food provision but is not a reasonable result to be included in the carbon trading system, even if it locks away carbon in solid mineral form. Future work should focus on consolidating the potential of GHG emissions and reducing nutrient loading in ponds and nearby coastal waters. Non-fed aquaculture is likely the primary problem-solving method to achieve these goals because it can avoid destroying natural harbors and attenuating nutrient excess in coastal waters. For example, mollusk aquaculture is a simple culture technique that is ecologically beneficial to the surrounding environment : it releases negligible GHGs from sediments without the influence of protein production , suggesting an environmentally friendly farming pathway.Monoculture production increases the risk of nutrient waste, whereas IMTA significantly increases the sustainability of recycling waste nutrients and is a greening system for high productivity rates, nutrient removal, and the production of a marketable product.

Additionally, IMTA may also benefit from improving acidification and deoxygenation and achieving ocean negative carbon emissions . Although this goal is unrealistic in the short term, studies should be conducted on expanding shellfish aquaculture worldwide . In our study, the disturbance of the sediment surface caused by water draining or tagelus activity contributed the largest part of non-CO2 GHG emissions and therefore should be considered in fed shelled-mollusk cultivation. Gentle water exchange modes or manual interventions are recommended to ameliorate the potential release of buried GHGs into atmosphere. By adopting moderate farming modes, mariculture can produce high-quality protein and provide low GHG emissions . Finally, non-CO2 GHGs, other than CO2, should be considered in the calculation of the potential effects of GHG emissions and the evaluation of the side effects of carbon sequestration and food production in mariculture. With a deep understanding of GHG emissions in aquaculture, incorporating shellfish cultivation into carbon trading schemes is possible, allowing the system to become a potential element of “blue carbon” systems. Tillage is a soil management practice that reduces production costs by facilitating various cropping tasks such as seeding, planting, fertilization and weed control; therefore, it remains one of the most common agricultural tasks worldwide . Against these advantages, unreasonable tillage presents a major environmental problem by accelerating erosion processes, being especially dangerous in sloping farmland . Tillage erosion is triggered during the production process and sometimes also acts as an aggravating factor for other land erosion events . Mechanized tillage generates alternative upward and downward soil movements that cause the alteration of the soil structure and make the soil more susceptible to degradation and fertility loss . In this sense, tillage direction is a decisive factor for assessing the impact of plowing on the soil profile , together with terrain features such as the slope gradient and other aspects inherent to agricultural practices such as the type of tools used, operation speed and depth of tillage . In addition, tillage direction is a critical value to determine input variables in models that study tillage erosion and water soil erosion, flood and drain tray such as the tillage transport coefficient and support practice factor.

The reason for this is that tillage oriented along the land slope can generate preferential runoff paths and cause an increase in water erosion . In contrast, contour farming, defined as plowing to constant elevations that are perpendicular to the normal flow direction of runoff , would allow us to control the harmful impacts of tillage on land modification and is considered a soil conservation practice . Therefore, the quality of the results provided by these soil erosion models depends largely on determining the tillage direction values and, as a result, defining the contour farming area with higher accuracy, which is viewed with great uncertainty due to the lack of precise and robust methodologies designed for this purpose . Remote sensing is a versatile technology with multiple applications in agricultural and environmental scenarios , such as those aimed at monitoring tillage or soil conservation practices , soil erosion phenomena associated with agricultural land uses and natural or artificial landscape features, e.g., terraces and physical obstacles, which allow control of run-off . Research specifically focused on the characterization and mapping of tillage metrics is further supported by geographic information systems , although real implementation of the proposed procedures presents certain limitations because they rely on strict hypotheses or have a very local scope. For example, Drzewiecki used available digital spatial data and a GIS environment to define parcel boundaries and applied a criterion of perpendicular coincidence between the main directions of the longest parcel edge and slope aspect to identify the parcels with contour farming in an upland area in southern Poland. This procedure was later automated for application to larger regions through the application of object-based image analysis  and implemented in a diversity of soil types and land forms by using light detection and ranging data and GIS tools . This method is valid only under the assumption that the plots are cultivated along their longest edge, which is not necessarily true in the case of mechanized plowing, and prevents its application in square plots with all edges of similar length . By applying other criteria, Panagos et al. estimated contour farming areas at the European level using the 25 m resolution digital elevation model and assuming that farmers had correctly implemented the good agricultural and environmental conditions defined in the common agricultural policy aiming to achieve sustainable agriculture.

However, this approach has the weakness of ignoring the fact that the effective control and monitoring of GAEC compliance is often hampered by technical and methodological problems . Despite the cited research efforts, to date, there are no remote sensing applications to accurately assess critical tillage features such as tillage direction and contour farming in cultivated plots, mainly due to the constraints inherent to the spatial resolution of piloted aircraft and satellite images , respectively that prevent the clear observation of the narrow tillage marks caused by machinery. Alternatively, unmanned aerial vehicles or drones now offer a viable option that has not yet been explored for this purpose. UAVs capture ultrahigh spatial resolution and on-demand aerial images that allow the detection of small geometrical patterns in the terrain, which is not possible with images from other conventional remotely-sensed platforms . The main difficulty with these UHR images in complex agricultural scenarios lies in the development of efficient analysis algorithms with the capability to identify tillage features and determine their main metrics. Tillage labour generally follows a fluctuating trajectory depending on parcel orography and the farmer’s arbitrary decisions on the time and manner of tilling, and the tillage marks appear in the images as linear objects that are affected by other elements of the scene, such as trees, shadows, cover crops, weeds, stones, etc., which break their linear structure and greatly complicate the image classification processes. This image analysis challenge can be met with the OBIA paradigm, which offers tools that are not available in traditional pixel-based methods . OBIA integrates the spectral, morphological, contextual and hierarchical characteristics of the segmented objects into the analysis, which leads to a high level of robustness and automation and a significant improvement in results compared with pixel-based methods .

These grasslands are cut at least once per year and autumn grazing is allowed

The objective of our study was to assess the impact of farming systems on soil quality in vegetable fields, focusing on the soil nematode community as an indicator of the soil food-web. We compared nematode communities in vegetable fields with extensively managed grasslands that do not receive any fertilizer and plant protection products.Due to the agricultural intensification under conventional farming, organic farming and extensive grasslands represent a gradient of management intensity, representing high-, moderate- and low-intensive management, respectively. We specifically addressed the following questions: to what extent does management intensity affect the abundance, diversity, community composition and functional guilds of soil nematodes? What accounts for the difference in soil nematode assemblages among conventional vegetable farming, organic vegetable farming and extensive grassland? Are there any nematode taxa that can be used as indicators of a specific management system? A farmer network consisting of 60 fields was established with20 conventional vegetable fields and 20 organic vegetable fields in the Canton of Zurich.

As a standard reference, 20 extensive grassland fields in close location were also selected. The conventional vegetable fields received pesticides and synthetic fertilizers and were managed according to guidelines of the federal office of agriculture. The organic vegetable fields were managed according to the guidelines of the Swiss organic farmers association ,ebb and flow table including no application of synthetic pesticides or synthetic fertilizers. Grasslands were managed according to the Swiss regulations for extensively managed meadows,which do not receive any fertilizer input and are mown at least once per year. In Switzerland, extensively managed meadows are considered as biodiversity promotion areas and farmers are financially compensated by the federal government with biodiversity contributions for the adapted use of their land. Agri-environmental schemes such as the Swiss BPA were introduced in many European countries in the 1990 s to alleviate the loss of biodiversity due to agricultural intensification. Swiss farmers must manage at least 7% of their agricultural land as BPA. The three farming systems are characterized in the Table S1 . The soils of the fields are classified as Cambisol, which is the predominant soil type in this region . The soil samples were collected in the period from 13 to 20 December 2016. At each field, we collected 10 soil cores with a stainless steel auger. These cores were immediately homogenized and placed into a sealing plastic bag. Sub-samples for soil analyses, pesticide analysis and molecular analyses were dried at room temperature, or stored at 4 ◦C or − 20 ◦C . In addition, a soil composite sample of approximately 20 kg of soil and consisting of ten individual soil samples was collected at each site with a shovel for nematode assessment and for the purpose of a greenhouse experiment of another study. In the laboratory, the composite sample for each site was passed through a 5 mm sieve, and visible living plant materials, visible macro-fauna , and stones were removed.

The sieved soil samples were stored in a plastic bag at 4 ◦C until further processing. Effects of farming system on variables including total nematode abundance, abundance per trophic group, nematode diversity indices, maturity indices, food web indices and metabolic footprints of soil nematodes were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with farming system as the fixed factor in R . Before analysis, the normality and the homogeneity of the residuals for data were examined by Shapiro-Wilk test or by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test in the ‘stats’ package. When the assumption of ANOVA of a given variable was violated, the effect of farming system on this variable was examined with non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test. When the effect of farming system on a given variable was significant, difference between treatments was further compared with a post-hoc test by the Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference test or the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test at α = 0.05 level. A Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate relationships between abiotic soil characteristics and nematode abundance as well as between microbial properties and nematode abundance. Community composition of soil nematodes across the three farming systems were compared with Bray–Curtis similarity using the canonical analysis of principal coordinates and per-mutational multivariate analysis of variance with 999 permutations using the ‘vegan’ packages in R. Finally, we identified potential habitat specialists or indicator taxa for conventional vegetable fields, organic vegetable fields and grasslands, using the indicator species analysis. The indicator species approach identifies a given taxa that tends to be present mostly in a single habitat type and most of the samples from that habitat based on the relative frequency and average abundance, and thus implies the nematode taxa preference for a given environmental condition. Specifically, the clusters were categorized by farming system in the analysis. Indicator species for each cluster were identified using the ‘multipatt’ function in the ‘indicspecies’ package in R . For each of the three farming systems, taxa with a p-value ≤0.05 and IndVal >0.30 were selected as potential indicator species. IndVal analysis was performed on soil nematode dataset.

Although the effect of organic management on soil nematode communities has been explored in previous studies, most of these studies were performed with field-trials.The strength of field-trials is that farming treatments are assessed under a standardized management at one location and with a specific soil type. However, management effects on nematode communities may differ in actual farmlands and thus the results obtained at a single site cannot be generalized. Environmental problems that may be associated with the increase in vegetable production with its intensive management practices is a concern, particularly negative impacts on biodiversity, leaching of nutrients into drinking water, or emissions of greenhouse gases. However, we still have a limited understanding of how soil biota such as nematode respond to vegetable production practices at the farm scale where soil type and nutrient availability are of higher heterogeneity. The present study reports the impact of vegetable management practices on soil nematode communities across many fields at a regional scale analyzing a total of 60 fields. Our results suggest that organic management alters overall community characteristics of soil nematodes. The abundances of herbivores, bacterivores and omnivores were greatly enhanced by organic management in comparison with conventional management . Organic management also enhanced composite footprint and herbivore footprint,indicating that organic farming supports higher herbivore abundance and herbivorous nematode individuals of higher biomass. Moreover, organic farming in vegetable fields resulted in notable shifts in soil nematode community despite of no obvious change in soil food-web index represented by BI, CI, EI and SI, decomposition and nutrient mineralization pathway represented by the Fu/ and primary production represented by Herb/ between conventional vegetable fields and organic vegetable fields . This indicates that there are no significant change in soil ecological processes and functions provided by the nematode communities in organic and conventionally managed fields in Switzerland. However, variation among fields was large and further studies need to verify our observation. The observed higher abundance and biomass of total nematodes in soils under organic farming compared to conventional farming in our study is consistent with an earlier field experiment where organic management supported higher nematode abundance and biomass compared to conventional management in vegetable fields .

We also found that the total nematode abundance in vegetable fields was lower than that in grasslands.This result supports a previous report showing that the land transformation from grassland to agricultural use reduces soil biota . Soil biota in extensive grasslands is generally subjected to fewer disturbances, such as tillage and/or pesticides application compared to arable fields, particularly vegetable fields. Moreover, higher plant diversity and litter coverage in grasslands usually retain higher soil moisture, and thus favour soil nematode colonization and reproduction. Overall, our results suggest a negative impact of land-use intensification on soil nematode abundance. Compared to the conventional farming systems, organic farming systems contained increased population densities of microbivorous and omnivorous nematodes. However, the threat of plant-parasitic nematodes to vegetable production, especially in organic vegetable production should be given attention, and integrated management strategies should be further developed and implemented . In agreement with previous studies , we found a higher abundance of herbivores, bacterivores and omnivores in organic vegetable fields, compared to conventional vegetable fields . Previous studies proposed that the intensive application of mineral fertilizer in conventional farming systems reduced bacteria-feeding nematodes due to direct toxicity of nitrogen solutions.Besides, flood table intensive agriculture may alter the biotic interactions and patterns of resource availability in ecosystems . Such disturbance would further affect nematode abundance by changing the growth and reproductive capacity of nematodes directly and indirectly. As hypothesized, we found that the correlations among edaphic properties, microbial attributes and nematode abundance depended on the trophic group of nematode examined. Interestingly, nematode abundance was found to be positively correlated with NH4+-N in the present study . Note that further work is needed to confirm our observations because we only sampled once and the sampling was conducting at the end of the growing season. Moreover, we sampled to a soil layer in depth of 10 cm while other studies sampled to a depth of 30 cm. This may also affect the nematodes detected. The EI indicates the prevalence of opportunistic species, whereas the metabolic footprint measures the carbon utilization of component taxa . Previous studies report that crop residue retention increases EI and SI . We hypothesized that greater levels for these variables in soils would be observed in organic vegetable fields due to increased residue inputs in organic management compared to conventional management.

Against expectation, we found the EI and SI in soils under organic management were comparable to those under conventional management. However, the composite metabolic footprint and herbivore footprint in soils under organic management was greatly enhanced in comparison to conventional management, implying vegetable fields under organic management supported herbivores with larger body size and higher biomass. The observed comparable level in Shannon-Weaver index between organic management and conventional management in the present study is in disagreement with earlier studies demonstrating that the application of organic manure resulted in a decline in Shannon-Weaver index possibly due to the predominance of r-selected species.One possible reason is that there are greater differences in mulch treatment which has been found to reduce the total number of nematode genera in organic vegetable fields across studies. Another likely explanation is that the effect of organic farming on the richness of nematodes might be time-dependent. A previous study found that organic vegetable farms were more diverse in terms of genera of herbivores than conventional farms at the vegetative and/or reproductive stage . However, in the present study, farmers could not allow us to sample when their fields had fully grown vegetables, and thus herbivores can be difficult to detect due to unfavorable climatic factors and limited food at the harvest of vegetables. Previous study suggested that shifts in community composition of soil organism are usually accompanied by changes in the functioning of soil food webs . The ratio of fungi to bacteria indicates soil microbial shifts, whereas the Fu/, reflects the decomposition and nutrient mineralization pathway due to microbial feeders for a given ecosystem. Small ratios are associated with faster decomposition and nutrient turnover. We observed no difference in the ratio of fungivore to bacterivore. This finding is in line with previous studies suggesting no difference in Fu/ ratio between conventional and organic fields . It is possible that the effects of organic farming on the Fu/ depend on the ecosystem type. The PPI, MI, and PPI/MI are valuable indicators used to evaluate agricultural ecosystems conditions . In the present study, PPI was unaffected by the management intensity whereas MI and PPI/MI ratio were significantly affected. Previous studies also reported mixed results with some studies reporting higher values for both variables under organic farming than conventional farming whereas another study reporting that organic farming increased the PPI, but did not affect the MI and PPI/MI . One likely reason may be that the effect of organic management on MI varies with depending on crop type. However, other factors, such as soil type, plough depth, cover crop type, and the management history might also contribute to the divergent effects of organic farming on nematode assemblage . For example, land transformation from grasslands to arable fields under intensive management results in a reduced the MI of soil nematode community,whereas the conversion from grasslands to vegetable fields did not change MI.