Because of their limited protein-coding capacities, geminiviruses rely heavily on host cellular machinery and interact with an assortment of plant proteins and pathways to promote infection . Although three of these genes have been assigned putative functions in viral DNA replication and coat formation , their specific functions in pathogenesis are yet to be elucidated. Our results indicated that the developmental stage of the berries may not influence the expression of GRBaV viral genes and that host factors could play a more critical role in the establishment of successful infections. Red blotch symptoms in grape berries include abnormal chemical composition and asynchronous ripening in the clusters , both reflecting alterations in host metabolic homeostasis and developmental processes. Interestingly, we determined that GRBaV infections induced some processes associated with early fruit development in berries at late stages of ripening, strawberry gutter system while repressing pathways involved in fruit ripening . Abiotic stress responses to hypoxia and temperature were also suppressed by red blotch in grape berries.
These observations may imply that the virus, as a biotrophic pathogen, could redirect host metabolic processes to sustain higher energy demands due to viral replication and at the same time suppressing ripening related events and responses to stress , potentially counterproductive to viral infections. However, further evidence using infected berries from different grape cultivars and environmental conditions will be necessary to understand how both grapevine genotype and environment may influence the disease outcome. It is also important to consider that the effects of GRBaV infections on berries may not be comparable with those occurring in vegetative tissues; for instance, photosynthetic pathways are generally inhibited during viral infections of grape leaves . GRBaV infections restricted the biosynthesis and accumulation of phenylpropanoids and derivatives, which preferentially accumulate after véraison in red-skinned berries. These secondary metabolites function as antioxidants and phytoalexins to protect the berries against a variety of stresses, and are important contributors of berry quality parameters, such as color, flavor, and aroma . The inhibition of phenylpropanoid metabolism appears to be a hallmark of viral infections in red-skinned berries, as has previously been reported in leaf roll-affected berries . In particular, the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway was greatly impaired as a result of leafroll and red blotch, correlating with the reduced coloration observed in GRBaVinfected berries from several red-skinned cultivars .
In this study, we demonstrated that GRBaV infections compromised the regulation of ripening by: suppressing specific ripening events; altering the expression patterns of transcription factors that control the transition from the growth to ripening phases and the activation of ripening pathways ; and causing hormonal imbalances. Most of the alterations in the ripening regulatory networks occurred in infected berries at véraison, the same developmental time when red blotch symptoms initiated, suggesting a link between mechanisms involved in the control of grapevine responses to viruses and berry development. Similar observations were made in leaf roll-affected berries, which presented lower expression levels of MYB transcription factors at late stages of ripening . Plant hormones modulate ripening processes and stress responses in grape berries. Red blotch had a profound impact on ABA, ethylene, and auxin pathways. ABA is considered the triggering signal of berry ripening, since its accumulation coincides with véraison and ABA responsive transcription factors have been implicated in the activation of ripening processes . Particularly, the induction of anthocyanin biosynthesis in a variety of grape cultivars has been linked to ABA-mediated signaling pathways . Our results indicate that alterations of ripening events in the GRBaV-infected berries, including the reduced anthocyanin content at late stages of ripening, could be a direct result of lower ABA levels at véraison. ABA has been shown to stimulate ethylene-mediated pathways in berries, and together both hormones appear to regulate the progression of ripening . GRBaV infections also affected genes involved in ethylene biosynthesis and responses , which could further account for the antagonistic effect of red blotch on ripening events and immune responses. In contrast, red blotch promoted auxin-mediated pathways, known to suppress berry ripening. Auxins play crucial roles in the early development of grape berries and are known to inhibit ripening processes by delaying ABA-triggered processes .
The mechanisms by which grapevine viruses cause disease in ripening berries need to be investigated. GRBaV may actively interfere with the regulation of berry ripening by hijacking the plant post-transcriptional control. We identified elements of the host post-transcriptional machinery that were misregulated in GRBaV-infected berries. Post-transcriptional regulation intersects plant immune responses, developmental transitions, and hormone signaling . Plant viruses, in particular geminiviruses, encode multiple silencing suppressors that interfere with host siRNA production and alter plant DNA methylation and miRNA pathways, causing developmental defects . A previous study on leaf roll indicated that the viral infection caused up-regulation of Dicer-like genes in ripening berries . Therefore, the relationship between the viral-induced repression of host RNA silencing processes and the post-transcriptional regulation of ripening should be addressed from the perspective of compatible grapevine– virus interactions.Shriveled berries on ripening clusters are not uncommon in California vineyards. They usually occur in only a small proportion of a vineyard’s fruit , but in particular vineyards and years, shriveling can affect more than half of the crop . Most shrivel disorders make the fruit less desirable for winemaking, with subsequent yield and production losses. Before taking steps to reduce the incidence of fruit shriveling in vineyards, it is necessary to differentiate between shrivel disorders. We describe four common causes of fruit shriveling and detail compositional differences between normally developing fruit and that affected by sugar accumulation disorder .Fruit exposed to direct sunlight for all or part of the day, especially in the heat of the afternoon, can be damaged by sunburn, which may be caused by high temperature, ultraviolet radiation or a combination of the two . The physical appearance of sunburned fruit depends on the grape variety and stage of development — white grapes and red grapes exposed before pigment accumulation begins develop brown discoloration, which varies depending on severity.Veraison and early postveraison red varieties with sunburn often exhibit poor color development, and may remain pink for the remainder of the season. Post-veraison sunburn leads to fruit with less color and a shiny appearance. Sunburned berries often crack, presumably due to damaged epidermal tissues. Extreme sunburn leads to complete berry desiccation and the formation of raisins in both red and white varieties. Sunburn only affects berries that are directly exposed to sunlight. The non-exposed side of a sunburned cluster often develops normally. If a cluster is fully exposed to the sun on both sides, hydroponic nft gully or if the rach is itself is damaged, then the cluster may be completely affected. Obvious signs of sunburn may only occur on the exposed portions of individual berries. Sunburn can be avoided by reducing the fruit’s exposure to direct sunlight, especially in the afternoon. While leaves are removed in the fruit zone in many growing regions to increase cluster exposure to indirect light, in north-south row orientations leaves are removed on the east side of the canopy to reduce direct exposure in the afternoon and the probability of sunburn. This practice does not completely eliminate the risk of sunburn, however, because morning sun can also cause damage.Natural dehydration is another type of shrivel that may affect berries late in ripening but prior to commercial harvest. These berries appear similar to fruit with bunchstem necrosis, but the rachis look green and healthy. For this type of shrivel, which is especially pronounced in Syrah , berries lose weight due to water loss, and sugars are concentrated . Both increased transpiration and decreased phloem infl ux have been suggested as causes for late-season dehydration, but recent studies provide evidence that several varieties of grape berries remain hydraulically connected to the parent vine and therefore may lose water back to the parent plant late in ripening as well as to dry, ambient air .Clusters affected by bunch stem necrosis are identifi ed by necrotic rachis tissue, with shriveled berries distal to the necrotic tissue. The visible symptoms of bunch stem necrosis begin as small black spots on pedicels , and progress to the lateral stem structure and rachis .
Usually, necrosis symptoms are not noted until the rachis is affected. Bunchstem necrosis may affect an entire cluster as well as the wings and tips of otherwise healthy clusters . It can occur in many varieties, but is especially prevalent in Cabernet Sauvignon on California’s North Coast. It has been described in the literature in many different countries, with descriptive terms that include waterberry , bunchstem dieback , shanking , stiellähme , palo negro , desséchement de la rafl e and dessichimiento della rachide . No specifi c cause of bunchstem necrosis has been identified, despite many years of research. In some cases, varietal differences in susceptibility have been correlated to xylem structure, specifically a reduction on the area of xylem distal to branch points in the peduncle . The incidence of bunchstem necrosis has also been correlated to various concentrations or ratios of mineral nutrients, including magnesium, calcium, potassium and nitrogen . Work in Chile and Australia has shown that the amino acid metabolite putrescine is associated with bunchstem necrosis. More light in the canopy can also reduce bunchstem necrosis . Bunchstem necrosis can appear very early in fruit development or after veraison. The terms “inflorescence necrosis” and “early bunchstem necrosis” have been used to describe bunchstem necrosis around bloom . The composition of such fruit varies depending on when during fruit development the rachis becomes necrotic. Presumably, the necrosis prevents both sugar and water transport to the berry. Hence, if the rachis becomes necrotic early in the ripening period before the berry has accumulated much sugar, fruit will have low Brix . On the other hand, if the rachis becomes necrotic after the berries have accumulated appreciable sugar, subsequent shriveling can concentrate the sugars. Bunchstem necrosis in Cabernet Sauvignon on the North Coast is usually the latter type. Fruit with bunchstem necrosis can have a Brix as high as 42 .Another disorder with symptoms that occur during the ripening period has been called “berry shrivel”; we recently proposed that it be called “sugar accumulation disorder” . This disorder was first described in Emperor table grapes from California’s San Joaquin Valley and is characterized by poor coloration and low sugar accumulation. Sugar accumulation disorder has been found in a number of varieties and is present in many areas of California. In general, it affects only a small proportion of clusters in a vineyard, though in certain years and vineyards up to 50% of the fruit can be affected. Regardless of the variety or location, fruit affected by sugar accumulation disorder has lower pH, berry weight and Brix compared with normally developing fruit . When multiple rachises and fruit with sugar accumulation disorder were tested for minerals, the only consistent difference from normally developing fruit or rachises was increased calcium in the rachis tissue . To test the hypothesis that fruit exhibiting sugar accumulation disorder may have altered nitrogen metabolism, we measured the amounts of nitrogenous compounds at harvest in fruit with the disorder compared to normally developing fruit. The vines were located at the UC Oakville Experimental Vineyard in the Napa Valley. Samples were taken at harvest on Oct. 21, 2005. Berries with sugar accumulation disorder came from clusters on six vines that historically exhibited the disorder and showed symptoms in 2005 . Normally developing berries came from clusters on three nearby vines that had no history of sugar accumulation disorder and did not display symptoms at harvest. Two berries were sampled from each cluster and eight to 10 berries were pooled to ensure enough material for analysis. Berries were peeled, their seeds removed and flesh homogenized. One milliliter of the homogenate was used for the analysis of nitrogenous compounds. Individual amino acids in three samples of berries with sugar accumulation disorder and normally developing berries were measured at the UC Davis Molecular Structure Facility . Briefly, juice samples were acidified with sulfosalicylic acid to precipitate any intact protein before analysis. Free amino acids were separated using a Li-citrate buffer system with ion exchange chromatography on a Hitachi L-8900 amino acid analyzer. Amino acids were quantified by a postcolumn ninhydrin-reaction detection system. Amino acid concentrations were quantified from peak areas using standard curves. Data was analyzed by ANOVA .